Kevin Riggle
@kevinriggle.bsky.social
Principal @ http://complexsystems.group. I keep people safe on the internet (trying). Looking at the world with an “anarchist squint” 🏳️🌈 @ kevinriggle@ioc.exchange
Reposted by Kevin Riggle
This is a ChatGPT mockup and not exactly what I had in mind but better than the three things I got before or the ostensible SVG of this that it gave me after
November 11, 2025 at 7:16 AM
This is a ChatGPT mockup and not exactly what I had in mind but better than the three things I got before or the ostensible SVG of this that it gave me after
I guess this gives them more exposure to the core of the nominal innovation, but it inflates the bubble there even further, and I was rather hoping this was the beginning of the pop
November 11, 2025 at 8:14 PM
I guess this gives them more exposure to the core of the nominal innovation, but it inflates the bubble there even further, and I was rather hoping this was the beginning of the pop
Reposted by Kevin Riggle
Softbank seems to have moved that money downstream towards software ala OpenAI, which doesn’t make sense.
November 11, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Softbank seems to have moved that money downstream towards software ala OpenAI, which doesn’t make sense.
Yeah reading deeper into this now I’m more confused
November 11, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Yeah reading deeper into this now I’m more confused
That’s the joke ;)
November 11, 2025 at 7:15 PM
That’s the joke ;)
Left college in 2008, and similarly, I would rather let the air out sooner and slower than later and faster
November 11, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Left college in 2008, and similarly, I would rather let the air out sooner and slower than later and faster
Couldn’t happen to a more deserving bunch of
November 11, 2025 at 7:14 PM
Couldn’t happen to a more deserving bunch of
I feel like I see the flip side of this also happening, from maybe the same underlying issues, where I sometimes get into arguments with people who are like “you should have known that that’s not what I intended my words to mean” and I’m like buddy I just read your literal words on the page
November 11, 2025 at 7:11 PM
I feel like I see the flip side of this also happening, from maybe the same underlying issues, where I sometimes get into arguments with people who are like “you should have known that that’s not what I intended my words to mean” and I’m like buddy I just read your literal words on the page
Reposted by Kevin Riggle
My kingdom to have someone ask him how he enjoyed Goncharov.
November 10, 2025 at 7:08 PM
My kingdom to have someone ask him how he enjoyed Goncharov.
Lord if it is to be my time then let me be an instrument of Your peace
November 11, 2025 at 8:17 AM
Lord if it is to be my time then let me be an instrument of Your peace
that's dumplings
November 11, 2025 at 8:16 AM
that's dumplings
I tend to think the fascist cowards will fold like the cowards they are, but we have to show up in numbers where if they don't then violence is the alternative and we will win it
November 11, 2025 at 8:13 AM
I tend to think the fascist cowards will fold like the cowards they are, but we have to show up in numbers where if they don't then violence is the alternative and we will win it
he's uninterested in vampires because they're not monstrous enough, not because they're not fuckable enough
November 11, 2025 at 8:11 AM
he's uninterested in vampires because they're not monstrous enough, not because they're not fuckable enough
Reposted by Kevin Riggle
it aligns very neatly with the right-wing perspective of "the in-group is for the PROTECTION of the law, the out-group is SUBJECT to the law"
they're not identical but they are closely enough aligned to be a workable alliance
they're not identical but they are closely enough aligned to be a workable alliance
November 11, 2025 at 8:06 AM
it aligns very neatly with the right-wing perspective of "the in-group is for the PROTECTION of the law, the out-group is SUBJECT to the law"
they're not identical but they are closely enough aligned to be a workable alliance
they're not identical but they are closely enough aligned to be a workable alliance
(which James and Paul do at least *twice* if I remember Reza Aslan correctly)
November 11, 2025 at 8:06 AM
(which James and Paul do at least *twice* if I remember Reza Aslan correctly)
I think the read here is that, if one assumes antinomianism, one reads Paul's letters and is like, "oh, yes, works DON'T matter!" and never gets to James calling Paul to literally take a (ritual) bath and renounce that interpretation
November 11, 2025 at 8:05 AM
I think the read here is that, if one assumes antinomianism, one reads Paul's letters and is like, "oh, yes, works DON'T matter!" and never gets to James calling Paul to literally take a (ritual) bath and renounce that interpretation