The motion is linked below as are documents from original case. The case, formerly known as Luévano v. Campbell, is now known as Luévano v. Ezell
www.justice.gov/usao-dc/medi...
clearinghouse.net/case/11314/

In contrast, when presidents desire to spend more than appropriated (which is regulated by the Anti-Deficiency Act), they do not systematically overspend. Paper linked below and comments welcome as I continue to revise and add further analysis!
tinyurl.com/impoundment

The Impoundment Control Act of 1974 banned unilateral impoundment but enforcement is uncertain. In practice, I find presidents were able to spend less than appropriated both before and after the ICA. While I observe less non-compliance immediately following the ICA, it rebounds.