If only the truncation here were the story.

Saw Sue Perkins (on Bake Off iirc) take the jar from a chap who couldn't open it, simply tap the side of the lid briskly against the worktop edge, then suitably unstuck easily open the jar. With the epithet, "Men *eyeroll*" 🤣
I've since used that trick myself 🤠

Now having looked at the rest of the site - wow it's so much worse. Whole thing is a rancid sea of AI slop. Even the site's "About" is just 🤮.

I don't get why - as far as I can tell there's no monetisation on it, just reams of slop. Unless there's a grift on subscribing to it.

Thanks. I'd read the first couple of paragraphs, thought it ok, but didn't read all of it before posting it elsewhere. Stupid mistake on my part. Have replaced it with Wikipedia! *sigh*

We were a certain type, trying to complete using only the pistols and not using any medpacks 😱

Absolutely have neither the reflexes nor patience for that any more 🤣

Nine in my case. All follow-backers.

Ugh. Next question could then have been, "so under what situations *would* you deliberately misgender people?"

"That signals that even if some people aren't happy with elements of his approach, they might not be ready to say he's doing a bad job as president. And while discontent is increasing among Republicans on certain issues, they're largely still behind him." (2/2)

Ah, quoted image has no alt text.

"The good news for Trump is that his overall approval hasn't fallen as steeply. The new poll found that 36% of Americans approve of the way he's handling his job as president which is down slightly from 42% in March." (1/2)