°Kerma
@kermamaker.bsky.social
🇪🇺🇩🇪
Neugierde war sein Schicksal.
Feeding your cognitive dissonance free of charge.
It will get worse.
Neugierde war sein Schicksal.
Feeding your cognitive dissonance free of charge.
It will get worse.
Since you didn't back your claim with data, i looked them up.
You are wrong.
You are wrong.
November 13, 2025 at 12:33 PM
Since you didn't back your claim with data, i looked them up.
You are wrong.
You are wrong.
Your pr "news" crumbles when fact checked and set into context.
There is no real upwards trend in nuclear production. But there is one in renewables.
There is no real upwards trend in nuclear production. But there is one in renewables.
October 28, 2025 at 8:57 AM
Your pr "news" crumbles when fact checked and set into context.
There is no real upwards trend in nuclear production. But there is one in renewables.
There is no real upwards trend in nuclear production. But there is one in renewables.
You should ask yourself just one question: If it is economical, why doesn't it happen already?
Despite all that past-time plans and announcements about that bright nuclear future.
Despite all that past-time plans and announcements about that bright nuclear future.
October 27, 2025 at 6:35 AM
You should ask yourself just one question: If it is economical, why doesn't it happen already?
Despite all that past-time plans and announcements about that bright nuclear future.
Despite all that past-time plans and announcements about that bright nuclear future.
You could debunk those claims easily by looking at the stats at energy-charts.de
Also, intl' trade is good because it pressures prices. And the lowest prices are those of renewables and the junky french nuclear power plants. The latter are going to leave the market sooner or later.
Also, intl' trade is good because it pressures prices. And the lowest prices are those of renewables and the junky french nuclear power plants. The latter are going to leave the market sooner or later.
October 26, 2025 at 9:08 AM
You could debunk those claims easily by looking at the stats at energy-charts.de
Also, intl' trade is good because it pressures prices. And the lowest prices are those of renewables and the junky french nuclear power plants. The latter are going to leave the market sooner or later.
Also, intl' trade is good because it pressures prices. And the lowest prices are those of renewables and the junky french nuclear power plants. The latter are going to leave the market sooner or later.
Facts speak louder than lies.
October 25, 2025 at 9:24 PM
Facts speak louder than lies.
Who do you criticise then?
Germany does shut down coal.
Germany does shut down coal.
October 25, 2025 at 9:22 PM
Who do you criticise then?
Germany does shut down coal.
Germany does shut down coal.
Youtube, aber eigentlich die ganze Informationssphäre, ist komplett caput, wir werden von harter Propaganda geflutet, die oberflächlich betrachtet nur nach automatisch generiertem Bullshit aussieht.
1 Mio. Views in drei Tagen bei 24K Abonnenten.. klar.
1 Mio. Views in drei Tagen bei 24K Abonnenten.. klar.
October 25, 2025 at 10:56 AM
Youtube, aber eigentlich die ganze Informationssphäre, ist komplett caput, wir werden von harter Propaganda geflutet, die oberflächlich betrachtet nur nach automatisch generiertem Bullshit aussieht.
1 Mio. Views in drei Tagen bei 24K Abonnenten.. klar.
1 Mio. Views in drei Tagen bei 24K Abonnenten.. klar.
Millionen Tonnen/Monat
September 2, 2025 at 12:21 PM
Millionen Tonnen/Monat
Habe mir die Daten mal aufbereitet.
Es sollte deutlich werden, worauf ich hinaus wollte: Die Tendenz ist viel schwächer, als es die andere Darstellung vermuten ließe.
Es sollte deutlich werden, worauf ich hinaus wollte: Die Tendenz ist viel schwächer, als es die andere Darstellung vermuten ließe.
September 2, 2025 at 11:47 AM
Habe mir die Daten mal aufbereitet.
Es sollte deutlich werden, worauf ich hinaus wollte: Die Tendenz ist viel schwächer, als es die andere Darstellung vermuten ließe.
Es sollte deutlich werden, worauf ich hinaus wollte: Die Tendenz ist viel schwächer, als es die andere Darstellung vermuten ließe.
Their new dynamic pricing really fails upon closer inspection.
It is only for DC, only cheaper only from 22-7h and only by one to three cents.
Between 7 and 22h it is more expensive 7-13 cents.
I cannot imagine the target group.
It is only for DC, only cheaper only from 22-7h and only by one to three cents.
Between 7 and 22h it is more expensive 7-13 cents.
I cannot imagine the target group.
August 18, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Their new dynamic pricing really fails upon closer inspection.
It is only for DC, only cheaper only from 22-7h and only by one to three cents.
Between 7 and 22h it is more expensive 7-13 cents.
I cannot imagine the target group.
It is only for DC, only cheaper only from 22-7h and only by one to three cents.
Between 7 and 22h it is more expensive 7-13 cents.
I cannot imagine the target group.
habe mal quergelesen und dachte, du übertreibst. aber dann...
Troll, Blockempfehlung.
Troll, Blockempfehlung.
August 18, 2025 at 5:18 AM
habe mal quergelesen und dachte, du übertreibst. aber dann...
Troll, Blockempfehlung.
Troll, Blockempfehlung.
Die Atomlobby schickt nur noch Anfänger an die Front, die dann solche großartigen News raushauen.
Tatsächlich ist dies ein Armutszeugnis: Die Ablösung des erdbebengefährdeten, russischen Schrottreaktors wurde verpasst, jetzt im Zugzwang, da es ca. 1/3 des Bedarfs produziert.
Tatsächlich ist dies ein Armutszeugnis: Die Ablösung des erdbebengefährdeten, russischen Schrottreaktors wurde verpasst, jetzt im Zugzwang, da es ca. 1/3 des Bedarfs produziert.
August 15, 2025 at 12:59 PM
Die Atomlobby schickt nur noch Anfänger an die Front, die dann solche großartigen News raushauen.
Tatsächlich ist dies ein Armutszeugnis: Die Ablösung des erdbebengefährdeten, russischen Schrottreaktors wurde verpasst, jetzt im Zugzwang, da es ca. 1/3 des Bedarfs produziert.
Tatsächlich ist dies ein Armutszeugnis: Die Ablösung des erdbebengefährdeten, russischen Schrottreaktors wurde verpasst, jetzt im Zugzwang, da es ca. 1/3 des Bedarfs produziert.
From 2021 to 2022, we lost 32 TWh nuclear, but fossil production only rose by 9 TWh.
From 2021 to 2023, nuclear dropped by ca. 60 TWh, while fossils also dropped by 46 TWh. Same pattern before ca. 2007.
Sure, in 2022 there was a special crisis situation. But it was in no way catastophic.
From 2021 to 2023, nuclear dropped by ca. 60 TWh, while fossils also dropped by 46 TWh. Same pattern before ca. 2007.
Sure, in 2022 there was a special crisis situation. But it was in no way catastophic.
August 15, 2025 at 9:22 AM
From 2021 to 2022, we lost 32 TWh nuclear, but fossil production only rose by 9 TWh.
From 2021 to 2023, nuclear dropped by ca. 60 TWh, while fossils also dropped by 46 TWh. Same pattern before ca. 2007.
Sure, in 2022 there was a special crisis situation. But it was in no way catastophic.
From 2021 to 2023, nuclear dropped by ca. 60 TWh, while fossils also dropped by 46 TWh. Same pattern before ca. 2007.
Sure, in 2022 there was a special crisis situation. But it was in no way catastophic.
Schauen sie mal hier, das ist an der Kreuzung.
July 28, 2025 at 9:35 AM
Schauen sie mal hier, das ist an der Kreuzung.
Eine LL-WP, also eine Splitklima, kann im Etagenbau niemand einbauen.
Ich rede hier von Städten und nicht dörflichen Eigenheimen.
Ich rede hier von Städten und nicht dörflichen Eigenheimen.
July 28, 2025 at 9:15 AM
Eine LL-WP, also eine Splitklima, kann im Etagenbau niemand einbauen.
Ich rede hier von Städten und nicht dörflichen Eigenheimen.
Ich rede hier von Städten und nicht dörflichen Eigenheimen.
Always insightful to look at other countries statistics, e.g. the USA: A whopping 60% fossil generation.
July 21, 2025 at 7:53 AM
Always insightful to look at other countries statistics, e.g. the USA: A whopping 60% fossil generation.
If you look closely, coal/lignity did by far not fully compensate for 2010's 133 TWh of nuclear electricity.
Coal and lignite are being phased out, no matter what you are trying to insinuate here.
Nuclear is history in germany; your biased engagement is of no practical use.
Coal and lignite are being phased out, no matter what you are trying to insinuate here.
Nuclear is history in germany; your biased engagement is of no practical use.
July 21, 2025 at 7:49 AM
If you look closely, coal/lignity did by far not fully compensate for 2010's 133 TWh of nuclear electricity.
Coal and lignite are being phased out, no matter what you are trying to insinuate here.
Nuclear is history in germany; your biased engagement is of no practical use.
Coal and lignite are being phased out, no matter what you are trying to insinuate here.
Nuclear is history in germany; your biased engagement is of no practical use.
And, to make it short, coal and lignite are much less significant in primary energy cosumption.
July 21, 2025 at 5:42 AM
And, to make it short, coal and lignite are much less significant in primary energy cosumption.
I'm not "claiming" sth. I only corrected wrong claims.
Again: If you are really curious, go and check the data for yourself.
Again: If you are really curious, go and check the data for yourself.
July 20, 2025 at 8:14 PM
I'm not "claiming" sth. I only corrected wrong claims.
Again: If you are really curious, go and check the data for yourself.
Again: If you are really curious, go and check the data for yourself.
You still confused lignite with coal.
Would you please look at the trend, you may want to adjust your opinion to the reality. Hambach is a symbol only.
Would you please look at the trend, you may want to adjust your opinion to the reality. Hambach is a symbol only.
July 19, 2025 at 10:24 AM
You still confused lignite with coal.
Would you please look at the trend, you may want to adjust your opinion to the reality. Hambach is a symbol only.
Would you please look at the trend, you may want to adjust your opinion to the reality. Hambach is a symbol only.
You are not describing the reality, there was never a decision coal/lignite vs. nuclear. The decision was to phase out _both_.
Just take a look at the real trend:
Just take a look at the real trend:
July 19, 2025 at 10:08 AM
You are not describing the reality, there was never a decision coal/lignite vs. nuclear. The decision was to phase out _both_.
Just take a look at the real trend:
Just take a look at the real trend: