That's Social Democracy, and it's a completely different thing. Also the current form of Social Democracy, besides the name, doesn't have anything in common with the historical Social Democracy(That is reformist marxism) either.

leads to a form of value hierarchy, in which for example a Jewish person's say, matters more than a non Jewish person's opinion on it... Or in this case, he criticizes the Cuban gov human rights record as if it's the same thing as the abuse by the United States. but actually there is no equivalency.

for example everytime he criticizes israel he tends to invite israel critical Jews to (possibly) suggest that his reporting on the genocide is done in good faith and is not anti semitic. Why is that? Cause I think this inevitably...

Next day he follows it up with another interview about how the "violence"(read it as resistance) toward that evil person/side is also abhorrent as if both sides have the same amount of power/influence to exercise...

What I hate about Mehdi's reporting method, is his insistence on "all-sideism". I like him a lot, Don't get me wrong, but every time I see him doing for example an interview with a \\insert a comically evil person, he grills them mercilessly, but the next day he follows up with an interview...