Of course the small boats will remain a totemic issue albeit won which none of the parties including Reform have sensible policies to reduce. At some point in the next 10 years I believe we will change our attitudes to immigration and be wanting immigrants to come to the UK.

Apologies, I met meant net emigration rather than immigration!

There is some very interesting data coming through now that shows that very soon we will be faced with net immigration and the soon after that the population size will start to reduce and will continue to reduce for several decades. At some point, this will feed through to the public consciousness.

I agree with all of the above but I do think the various institutions who pushed B****** now need an off-ramp, it having comprehensively failed economically. So the tide will turn but it will be over several years. I expect the Tories to start turning against it at some point

Thanks for reply- sorry- I meant how did it recover?

How did they do it?

Just finished it. Very good. Thank you

Sorry but am a bit confused. Is he wrong in the first headline or the second?

This is the best tweet I’ve seen in a long time.

I can’t stand ‘some say’. It is a weasel and cowardly way of suggesting something that there isn’t any evidence for.

Why did BBC or ITV not make it? I think ten years ago they would have. Is there any reason why they did not?

Didn’t Macquarie (Aus bank) saddle them with a load of debt which is now unaffordable? Classic Tory privatisation. Build up a utility that belongs to the public, sell it as a monopoly to their mates, fuck it up totally, tab then picked up by- you’ve guessed it- UK public

He’s been hitting the KoolAid

What I want to know is ‘who paid for Starmer’s suits?’

I’ve destroyed loads of other companies and many high streets all over the world and now I want to destroy a great newspaper

🤞🤞🤞

Trump doesn’t understand soft power or long term relationships

It’s very interesting how we all interpret facts. Almost as if we only believe what we want to believe and are not truly rational.

Yes maybe I should have said highly educated instead of clever