ทำไมผมไม่เจอ

ถ้าเราไม่หายใจ ฝุ่นก็ทำอะไรปอดไม่ได้หรอกครับ - อนุกูล ชาญวิรทิน

For a new platform like Bluesky, it’s crucial to set the foundation right from the start, allowing for maximum freedom of speech while empowering users to take an active role in maintaining a safe community.

In that regard, I think X's community notes is in the right direction.

The transparency around Trust and Safety (TnS) on major platforms has become quite opaque, which circles back to my initial question: whose TnS are we living under?

At a peer-to-peer level, though, it feels like content moderation should come down to personal preference. Perhaps it’s a matter of 'like' or 'dislike', where users can choose to block or mute content and individuals without needing top-down enforcement.

Thanks for your thoughts, Solis.

I agree with much of what you’re saying—there is a general consensus on universally harmful content like pure hatred, graphic violence, abuse, and child exploitation that shouldn't be allowed, aligning with standards recognized by global bodies.

Trust and safety mean different things to each of us, but I believe it’s crucial that individuals—not platforms—assess them. Users should have the freedom to explore and make an informed decision about staying or leaving. Meta’s strict AI-driven bans differ from X’s minimal oversight, gone Mad Max.