There is another option, vote and vote with your wallet. Disagree with fossil fuel being used, do not use any, and if enough do that, there will be no money in it.
Instead vote/spend on alternatives you agree with, again other way, if enough invest in green, companies will put their focus there.

Closing thoughts: post is my thoughts from someone on the outside looking in, someone who gets most healthcare needed at close to no out of pocket cost, with minimal wait times. And who pays less in tax to fund healthcare than most US citizen pay for partial coverage with insurance plans.

13) Uninsured/Underinsured: A significant portion of the U.S. population has no insurance or is underinsured, severely limiting all healthcare choices for them until an emergency occurs, at which point care is provided regardless of ability to pay, but at a high cost to the system and patient

12a) Many such countries also have supplementary private options that citizens can use if they desire more choice or faster access for non-urgent care.

12) Access vs. Choice: Government-run systems in other wealthy nations typically guarantee universal access to basic care, ensuring that everyone can get necessary treatment without fear of bankruptcy.

11) Different Types of Limitations: The statement suggests government-run systems inherently have more limitations. While some systems have wait times for non-urgent/elective, the U.S. system rations care by ability to pay, creating its own form of limitation for the uninsured & underinsured.

10a) This financial burden itself limits a person's "choice" to seek care in the first place, with one-third of U.S. families having to put off healthcare due to cost

10) Individual Responsibility and Cost: The "personal responsibility" aspect translates to individuals bearing significant financial risk through high premiums, deductibles, and out-of-pocket costs, which can lead to substantial medical debt.

9) Choice of Health Plans (Often Limited): While there are many plans available on the market, most receive insurance through their employer, who offers a limited selection. The ability to shop outside employer plan is often not financially feasible due to high cost of individual premiums.

8) Many marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act also use limited provider networks, with enrollees having access to only a fraction of local doctors on average.

Physicians can also choose which insurance plans they accept, which further limits patient choice.

7) Plans like Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) or Preferred Provider Organizations (PPOs) have specific networks, and going "out-of-network" results in significantly higher costs, making true "free choice" a financial impossibility for most.

6) Choice of Doctors (Limited): The current U.S. system offers a theoretical broad choice, but in reality, access to doctors is significantly limited by insurance networks.
Most Americans have employer-sponsored insurance, and their choices are constrained to a network of approved providers.

5) Geographic Limitations: In some rural areas, there may be limited doctors or hospitals, and perhaps only one or two insurance providers available on the marketplace, which restricts meaningful choice regardless of the system design.

4) Cost as a Limiting Factor: High deductibles, co-pays, and premiums mean that for many, the "choice" to opt for a more comprehensive plan or a specific out-of-network specialist is financially prohibitive, making it a choice in name only.

3) Narrow Networks: Even within a chosen plan, individuals are often restricted to a specific network of doctors and hospitals (HMOs and PPOs have these limitations) to get the best price. Going out-of-network results in significantly higher costs, effectively limiting "choice of doctors."

2) Employer-Sponsored Insurance: The vast majority of Americans get their insurance through their employer, who often selects a single insurer or a small set of plans, severely limiting the employee's "individual choice" of plans.

1) Inaccuracy in practice/real-world limitations: Critics argue the statement oversimplifies the reality for many Americans today, who often have limited choices in practice:

\ Damn