Kelly Ross
kellybruys.bsky.social
Kelly Ross
@kellybruys.bsky.social
Retired former AFL-CIO Policy Director. "Colonization dehumanizes the colonizer" (Aime Cesaire). He/him. Visca el Barça.
Pinned
Progressive International claims that US aggression against Venezuela fits within a larger strategy of “strategic sequencing” — meaning the staggering of a series of conflicts to isolate and exhaust centers of resistance to US global primacy. 🧵1/20
"US strategists describe this as "strategic sequencing" — staggered global confrontation designed to isolate and exhaust centers of resistance one-by-one, preventing their consolidation into a unified anti-hegemonic bloc. It's a world war in slow motion." progressive.international/wire/2025-10...
"This is world war in slow motion."
Popular forces around the world oppose the escalating war on Venezuela — part of a renewed Global Monroe Doctrine that seeks to dismantle sovereignty and self-determination around the world.
progressive.international
Meanwhile in France, President Macron sends out his army chief of staff to announce that the French must accept “losing their children” and “suffering economically” to fight a war against Russia. 🧵1/5
November 21, 2025 at 6:25 PM
In a November 11 speech to the European Parliament, Prof. John Mearsheimer provides a very useful rundown of essential factual background to the Ukraine war — information that very few Americans have ever been exposed to. 1/9 mearsheimer.substack.com/p/my-talk-at...
My Talk at the European Parliament
On 11 November 2025, I spoke in Brussels at the European Parliament on “Europe’s Bleak Future.”
mearsheimer.substack.com
November 19, 2025 at 3:54 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
"The genocide in Gaza and the looming conflict in Venezuela (and elsewhere) are statements of intent, early examples of this nascent new order. An overriding moral imperative demands both must be stopped, but prudential self-protective reasons militate toward action as well." 6/6
November 14, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
"As far as the United States is concerned, the aspirations of the UN Charter—a world without aggression, and ultimately, without war—have been declared dead and, in any event, undesirable. The world-system as we know it is over." 5/6
November 14, 2025 at 2:18 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
"America, along with Israel, has apparently chosen what kind of system it intends to build in its wake: a new era of slaughter against the world’s political and economic surplus populations, a world untethered from even the pursuit of equality and peace." 4/6
November 14, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
"What we are now witnessing is an opening salvo in the long struggle to resolve this crisis in which ‘the demise of the existing historical system is certain and which therefore presents those found within it with a real historical choice: what kind of new historical system to build or create.’” 3/6
November 14, 2025 at 2:17 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
"Rather than adapt to the changing world-system, the US has decided it no longer needs legitimacy as it gears up for a new round of conquest and diplomacy-by-bomb to combat and contain China and rewind the structural crisis in which it finds itself.” 2/6
November 14, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
“What we are seeing now from the Trump administration is a US empire increasingly willing to dispense with even the perfunctory legal legitimation that past presidents leaned on.” 1/6 www.thenation.com/article/worl...
Why Trump’s Venezuela Attacks Matter So Much
They signal a US empire increasingly willing to dispense with even the perfunctory legal legitimation that past presidents leaned on.
www.thenation.com
November 14, 2025 at 2:15 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
The obscenely high number of Ukrainians casualties clearly does not enter into their calculations. And I doubt they regret provoking a global confrontation, since at least some of them had concluded by 2020 that this was inevitable to perpetuate the "US-led global order." 23/23
November 9, 2025 at 3:26 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
But are they really disappointed? They prevented Russian economic integration with Europe; tightened US domination of the continent; and developed a powerful narrative that will help them sell the public on a global confrontation to shore up the crumbling US world empire. 22/23
November 9, 2025 at 3:25 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
One could argue that US empire planners screwed up badly trying to flip Russia against China by dealing Russia a strategic defeat in Ukraine (in 2020-2021!). They lost their proxy war against Russia, strengthened the Russian economy, and cemented the Sino-Russian alliance. 21/23
November 9, 2025 at 3:24 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
If the above analysis is correct, it would mean US empire planners have already made extraordinarily consequential warlike decisions with no pretense of democratic accountability; with poor understanding of the situation; and without fully thinking through the consequences. 20/20
November 7, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
Though the language of “avoiding a two-front war” sounds defensive, the assumption of future conflict is bellicose. Mitchell called for “making the most of America’s quickly closing window of opportunity”—before “future conflict”—to "sequence the Russia and China threats.” 19/20
November 7, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
Mitchell further argued that a strategy of “diplomatic concourse” and “compromise” would be a concession to Russia and China, who are engaged with the US in a competition of political and economic systems, and would signal weakness, making a multi-front war more likely. 18/20
November 7, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
Why would US empire planners commit to such a strategy? Mitchell ruled out the alternative strategy of “cooperation” because he said Russia and China want to “weaken the US-led global order," and any reform of the global order is apparently out of the question. 17/20
November 7, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
And we should understand US attacks on Venezuela and Colombia as another campaign to eliminate resistance to US regional hegemony. US moves to appropriate resources of the countries most vulnerable to US coercion look like preparation for future global confrontation. 16/20
November 7, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
If this is correct, then we must understand the series of conflicts we see unfolding every day as sequenced battles in a larger confrontation with Russia and China. This is why Progressive International describes strategic sequencing as a "world war in slow motion.” 15/20
November 7, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
Strategic sequencing would explain why the US immediately closed all off-ramps to end the war in Ukraine, which struck me at the time as wildly reckless. It indicated to me that the US anticipated escalation until achieving Russia's strategic defeat and/or regime change. 14/20
November 7, 2025 at 9:50 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
The problem, Mitchell wrote, was that Russia would not “flip” against China unless it were dealt a strategic defeat in Ukraine. Mitchell’s (flawed) reasoning thus provides a plausible explanation for otherwise inexplicable US behavior in Ukraine. 13/20
November 7, 2025 at 9:50 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
In 2021 Mitchell wrote, "the most common form of sequencing is to align with the weaker of two rivals in order to concentrate resources on the stronger." This would be the Nixon example of “flipping” China against Russia, but in this case "flipping" Russia against China. 12/20
November 7, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
How can we know whether the US empire is applying a strategy of “strategic sequencing”? Such questions are purposefully obscured by pervasive war propaganda and lack of transparency, but strategic sequencing certainly fits the facts we know and helps explain US behavior. 11/20
November 7, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
Eliminating resistance to US hegemony in West Asia, in turn, is critical for setting up the next in a series of staggered conflicts — against China. This is because much of West Asia’s energy resources now flow eastward to China and southeast Asia.10/20
bsky.app/profile/kell...
Adam Hanieh: “The centrality of the Middle East to the global oil economy is often left out of the picture, and I really do think it’s impossible to understand the year of genocide we’re witnessing without centering the story of oil.” 🧵1/3 www.youtube.com/watch?v=E41F...
How Oil Fuels Global Capitalism | Adam Hanieh | TMR
YouTube video by The Majority Report w/ Sam Seder
www.youtube.com
November 7, 2025 at 9:48 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
It is certainly arguable that Russia would have more actively assisted the resistance to US hegemony in Syria (possibly also Iran, Lebanon, and Gaza) had it not been tied down in Ukraine and facing the threat of escalation in a proxy war with NATO. 9/20
bsky.app/profile/kell...
November 7, 2025 at 9:48 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
Though the US ultimately failed to deal Russia a “strategic defeat” in Ukraine, one consequence of sequencing this conflict first was to clear the way for a later US campaign to eliminate resistance to US hegemony in West Asia (the Middle East). 8/20
November 7, 2025 at 9:44 PM
Reposted by Kelly Ross
The linked article in Defense Magazine argues that the US did in fact apply a strategy of “strategic sequencing” in Ukraine — essentially laying a trap for Russia, much like the trap it laid for the USSR in Afghanistan in 1979. 7/20 www.defensemagazine.com/article/opin...
Opinion: Does strategic sequence theory guide U.S. foreign policy?
It is obvious that the US can no longer conduct its foreign policy in a way that is inconsistent with its economic and resulting military resources. It is also…
www.defensemagazine.com
November 7, 2025 at 9:44 PM