Lawyers from the ACLU, ORA and others have worked on this for years.

Congratulations to the 1A groups that worked on this.

the briefing of the case itself.

The judge had bought the argument that it could lead to violence against the husband if the video remained online, but didn’t merely order removal of the video — but all of the case and appeal.

The board must align its public comment policies with the First Amendment

I took an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States same as you @VictoriaCWA — the egregious violations of the @USConst_Amend_I will not be allowed to endure.

Not here.

The video is a public record and it’s a choice between believing Board Vice President @VictoriaCWA or your lying eyes…

FIRE is calling on the Teaneck Board of Education to revise its public comment policies and allow its constituents to speak at board meetings without facing unconstitutional censorship.

Response from @VictoriaCWA here:

(Anyone in a position of authority that acts like this should resign immediately)

I feel seen.
“We are living in a streaming paradox. As both an entertainment business model and a consumer experience, streaming has become a victim of its own success… more choice than ever before, while also making it harder than ever to actually enjoy that abundance.”

Same. I remember these, too.