I agree - a provocative piece of cheap rhetoric. Where are the Xian voices addressing the core issue of whether & when people with horrid conditions could be allowed to choose a dignified way out? Why is the Xian debate dominated by what might happen rather than by the suffering that is happening?

It certainly has a rather more confident tone than I would think appropriate on such a difficult matter. It's interesting that most, if not all, of the objections I've heard are 'thin end of the wedge' arguments - a kind I am rarely persuaded by on most matters