Keeper
@keeper86.bsky.social
Physicist, born at 345 ppm
Optimistic, utilitarian, nihilistic, moral determinist
he/him
Optimistic, utilitarian, nihilistic, moral determinist
he/him
Clickbait.
Begründung ist zu verstehen.
Begründung ist zu verstehen.
November 25, 2025 at 9:31 PM
Clickbait.
Begründung ist zu verstehen.
Begründung ist zu verstehen.
"Ich bin dagegen" ist keine wirkliche politische Position.
"Gefühlte Unsicherheit" lässt sich nicht mit Polizei lösen
Damit wir spezifisch werden: was ist eine politische Position der AfD (abseits strikter Leugnung von wissenschaftlichem Konsens), welche nicht von anderen Parteien abgebildet wird?
"Gefühlte Unsicherheit" lässt sich nicht mit Polizei lösen
Damit wir spezifisch werden: was ist eine politische Position der AfD (abseits strikter Leugnung von wissenschaftlichem Konsens), welche nicht von anderen Parteien abgebildet wird?
November 25, 2025 at 9:25 PM
"Ich bin dagegen" ist keine wirkliche politische Position.
"Gefühlte Unsicherheit" lässt sich nicht mit Polizei lösen
Damit wir spezifisch werden: was ist eine politische Position der AfD (abseits strikter Leugnung von wissenschaftlichem Konsens), welche nicht von anderen Parteien abgebildet wird?
"Gefühlte Unsicherheit" lässt sich nicht mit Polizei lösen
Damit wir spezifisch werden: was ist eine politische Position der AfD (abseits strikter Leugnung von wissenschaftlichem Konsens), welche nicht von anderen Parteien abgebildet wird?
Ja.
Ist unangenehm sich das selbst einzugestehen.
Ist unangenehm sich das selbst einzugestehen.
November 25, 2025 at 9:21 PM
Ja.
Ist unangenehm sich das selbst einzugestehen.
Ist unangenehm sich das selbst einzugestehen.
Gelernt von der besten?
November 25, 2025 at 9:00 PM
Gelernt von der besten?
Die eine Hälfte habe ich mitbekommen, was ist die andere Hälfte?
November 25, 2025 at 7:57 PM
Die eine Hälfte habe ich mitbekommen, was ist die andere Hälfte?
Since hegseth is a drunk idiot, seems reasonable
November 25, 2025 at 1:58 PM
Since hegseth is a drunk idiot, seems reasonable
Reposted by Keeper
It’s especially ironic because the lecture is exactly about the ‘paralyzing cowardice’ of today’s elites.
About universities, corporations and media networks bending the knee to authoritarianism. /4
About universities, corporations and media networks bending the knee to authoritarianism. /4
November 25, 2025 at 9:26 AM
It’s especially ironic because the lecture is exactly about the ‘paralyzing cowardice’ of today’s elites.
About universities, corporations and media networks bending the knee to authoritarianism. /4
About universities, corporations and media networks bending the knee to authoritarianism. /4
Keep it simple. Everybody happy.
November 25, 2025 at 11:21 AM
Keep it simple. Everybody happy.
As if they forgot covid.
Yes. We can get rid of half of flying next year if deemed necessary.
We got rid of nearly 15% of emissions overnight (of course we quickly returned that to "normal")
Overconsumption might feel existential. Its not.
Yes. We can get rid of half of flying next year if deemed necessary.
We got rid of nearly 15% of emissions overnight (of course we quickly returned that to "normal")
Overconsumption might feel existential. Its not.
November 25, 2025 at 11:17 AM
As if they forgot covid.
Yes. We can get rid of half of flying next year if deemed necessary.
We got rid of nearly 15% of emissions overnight (of course we quickly returned that to "normal")
Overconsumption might feel existential. Its not.
Yes. We can get rid of half of flying next year if deemed necessary.
We got rid of nearly 15% of emissions overnight (of course we quickly returned that to "normal")
Overconsumption might feel existential. Its not.
And that the whole world will govern it and pay for it.
Its a lie.
A very dangerous one.
Its a lie told by fossilists to calm down enough ppl so they can continue burning fossils
There is one way. Emissions Reduction. But ppl keep telling me that this is impossible, so better we do insane stuff
Its a lie.
A very dangerous one.
Its a lie told by fossilists to calm down enough ppl so they can continue burning fossils
There is one way. Emissions Reduction. But ppl keep telling me that this is impossible, so better we do insane stuff
November 25, 2025 at 11:14 AM
And that the whole world will govern it and pay for it.
Its a lie.
A very dangerous one.
Its a lie told by fossilists to calm down enough ppl so they can continue burning fossils
There is one way. Emissions Reduction. But ppl keep telling me that this is impossible, so better we do insane stuff
Its a lie.
A very dangerous one.
Its a lie told by fossilists to calm down enough ppl so they can continue burning fossils
There is one way. Emissions Reduction. But ppl keep telling me that this is impossible, so better we do insane stuff
1000W/m^2 from the sun.
3W/m^2 global warming (yes, the inbalance is way less than 1%.
Total energy consumption of humankind 0.03W/m^2
You suggest to block precisely a small fraction of sun Light and guarantuee that fluctuation are small enough that it provides homogeneous cooling.
3W/m^2 global warming (yes, the inbalance is way less than 1%.
Total energy consumption of humankind 0.03W/m^2
You suggest to block precisely a small fraction of sun Light and guarantuee that fluctuation are small enough that it provides homogeneous cooling.
November 25, 2025 at 11:10 AM
1000W/m^2 from the sun.
3W/m^2 global warming (yes, the inbalance is way less than 1%.
Total energy consumption of humankind 0.03W/m^2
You suggest to block precisely a small fraction of sun Light and guarantuee that fluctuation are small enough that it provides homogeneous cooling.
3W/m^2 global warming (yes, the inbalance is way less than 1%.
Total energy consumption of humankind 0.03W/m^2
You suggest to block precisely a small fraction of sun Light and guarantuee that fluctuation are small enough that it provides homogeneous cooling.
Again: it is a dangerous idea, nobody knows the consequences and you just want to solve one unintended global engineering catastrastophe with an intended catastrophe.
Are you aware of the involved energy fluxes? Do you think "nature is small" and we can just manipulate it at will?
Are you aware of the involved energy fluxes? Do you think "nature is small" and we can just manipulate it at will?
November 25, 2025 at 11:07 AM
Again: it is a dangerous idea, nobody knows the consequences and you just want to solve one unintended global engineering catastrastophe with an intended catastrophe.
Are you aware of the involved energy fluxes? Do you think "nature is small" and we can just manipulate it at will?
Are you aware of the involved energy fluxes? Do you think "nature is small" and we can just manipulate it at will?
But there seems no reasonable humans left, so go ahead.
Let them introduce dangerous global-scale (because we are so great at organizing and govern things at that scale) experiments that can and will go horribly wrong.
Cause reducing consumption is impossible.
Sure.
Let them introduce dangerous global-scale (because we are so great at organizing and govern things at that scale) experiments that can and will go horribly wrong.
Cause reducing consumption is impossible.
Sure.
November 25, 2025 at 10:17 AM
But there seems no reasonable humans left, so go ahead.
Let them introduce dangerous global-scale (because we are so great at organizing and govern things at that scale) experiments that can and will go horribly wrong.
Cause reducing consumption is impossible.
Sure.
Let them introduce dangerous global-scale (because we are so great at organizing and govern things at that scale) experiments that can and will go horribly wrong.
Cause reducing consumption is impossible.
Sure.
No.
Its a way to mess up even greater. It is naive, dangerous and dumb.
Stop emissions. Get real. Live sustainable.
Its a way to mess up even greater. It is naive, dangerous and dumb.
Stop emissions. Get real. Live sustainable.
November 25, 2025 at 10:14 AM
No.
Its a way to mess up even greater. It is naive, dangerous and dumb.
Stop emissions. Get real. Live sustainable.
Its a way to mess up even greater. It is naive, dangerous and dumb.
Stop emissions. Get real. Live sustainable.
It is stupidly dangerous.
So yes, of course humans will do it.
So yes, of course humans will do it.
November 25, 2025 at 10:03 AM
It is stupidly dangerous.
So yes, of course humans will do it.
So yes, of course humans will do it.
Das freut mich aufrichtig.
November 24, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Das freut mich aufrichtig.
Disclaimer: ohne Bafög hätte ich nicht studiert. Ich bin Deutschland (oder hier NRW) dankbar dafür.
November 24, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Disclaimer: ohne Bafög hätte ich nicht studiert. Ich bin Deutschland (oder hier NRW) dankbar dafür.
Also wenn die soziale Mobilität nur temporär durch die verschiedenen Krisen schlechter wurde, müsste man bei einer zukünftigen Studie mit gleicher Methodologie einen Rückgang des Einflusses von connections sehen, falls das neue Normal nicht die Dauerkrise ist?
November 24, 2025 at 6:12 PM
Also wenn die soziale Mobilität nur temporär durch die verschiedenen Krisen schlechter wurde, müsste man bei einer zukünftigen Studie mit gleicher Methodologie einen Rückgang des Einflusses von connections sehen, falls das neue Normal nicht die Dauerkrise ist?