Not convinced this is real though. It's not beyond him, mind you, just looks edited.

Yeah, probably not real.

Please verify this stuff before reposting from social media.

Funny, if you vote to show the Epstein files, Trump disowns you. Must be something worth losing friends over in those files.

Glad you can read that. I think I must have slid half that sentence around! 😄

There is a moral concern that if we use bad-faith tactics we are no better than them. Not sure that concern should outweigh the loss of democracy tho.

It is very much a war footing to say, "we may have to commit atrocities, but once we win, we will improve everyone's behavior" & may not work.

imagine a voting public that doesn't completely implode every 8 years

What I can't believe is that they had a meeting to discuss how to handle it and this is the best they came up with.

This is definitely the upsidedown.

I think the implication is alive and feeling the pain of it. Feet first would be for the worst possible people.

Hoping to be marinated before I'm eaten, thanks!

right. blame the people who lost rather than the people who voted for the habitually lying felon.

Never did understand how the word "uneducated" didn't sort of piss them off to begin with. Like, it's clearly meant to sound bad rather than something like "real workers" so why did they accept it? I get calling people "academics" or whatever as a negative, but how can you hear "uneducated" as nice?

🤣😆😬😐🤔😯🙁😠

Yeah, but a lot of jobs are thankless and even a vacuum would be better than current leadership. Cut the man loose and someone will move in.

While I get some of the logic, it's still not a good enough deal for Dems and leadership doesn't have new ideas.

The only way for any of them to prove that they want to fix things is to dump Schumer and try something new.

No, but he doesn't try anything new so it seems time for a change.

Yeah, sorry about that. He's doing mostly good but we have to keep pushing him to do better.

It's time for Schumer to go.