KC
@kcwinters.bsky.social
💙 Liberal 4ever. INFJ. Retired prof. Travel, cats, genealogy, steampunk, books, history, coffee, & crafting are my love language. #readbannedbooks #resist #3e #nokings 🇺🇸 🇺🇦
Porn/crypto/sales/etc/no or minimal bio/posts=🚫
NO LISTS/PACKS MEANS NO LISTS!✌️🪷💙
Porn/crypto/sales/etc/no or minimal bio/posts=🚫
NO LISTS/PACKS MEANS NO LISTS!✌️🪷💙
Reposted by KC
So yes, depending on how the DOJ applies these carve-outs, certain names could still be redacted lawfully.
November 18, 2025 at 9:32 PM
So yes, depending on how the DOJ applies these carve-outs, certain names could still be redacted lawfully.
Reposted by KC
- “Active investigation” loophole
- National security classification loophole
- Victim-privacy entanglement
- General personal-privacy exceptions
- National security classification loophole
- Victim-privacy entanglement
- General personal-privacy exceptions
November 18, 2025 at 9:32 PM
- “Active investigation” loophole
- National security classification loophole
- Victim-privacy entanglement
- General personal-privacy exceptions
- National security classification loophole
- Victim-privacy entanglement
- General personal-privacy exceptions