Kristin Connor
@kconnor.bsky.social
🤰🏽My lab conducts research on developmental origins of health & disease
👶🏻Believe a healthy start to life is a right we all share
👩🏼🔬Value fundamental science!
📍Toronto & Ottawa
connorlab.ca
👶🏻Believe a healthy start to life is a right we all share
👩🏼🔬Value fundamental science!
📍Toronto & Ottawa
connorlab.ca
This is happening all around Ontario too.
Federal and provincial governments hate PSE and investing where their own reports say they should to improve the economy & human capital.
Federal and provincial governments hate PSE and investing where their own reports say they should to improve the economy & human capital.
a man is holding a sign that says slash it .
ALT: a man is holding a sign that says slash it .
media.tenor.com
November 9, 2025 at 10:43 PM
This is happening all around Ontario too.
Federal and provincial governments hate PSE and investing where their own reports say they should to improve the economy & human capital.
Federal and provincial governments hate PSE and investing where their own reports say they should to improve the economy & human capital.
It looks like a map of New Zealand!
November 9, 2025 at 7:14 PM
It looks like a map of New Zealand!
Thank you for everything you are doing for the community!!
November 7, 2025 at 11:31 PM
Thank you for everything you are doing for the community!!
Perhaps not! Tho the AI tools the data might be dumped in likely are, & the people with the best analytical & contextual knowledge to handle these data are those directly at the tricouncils.
The egregious ask suggests there would be high bias in how the committee handles/interprets the data
The egregious ask suggests there would be high bias in how the committee handles/interprets the data
November 6, 2025 at 2:35 AM
Perhaps not! Tho the AI tools the data might be dumped in likely are, & the people with the best analytical & contextual knowledge to handle these data are those directly at the tricouncils.
The egregious ask suggests there would be high bias in how the committee handles/interprets the data
The egregious ask suggests there would be high bias in how the committee handles/interprets the data
Yes this!! Great advice!
November 6, 2025 at 2:26 AM
Yes this!! Great advice!
Indeed — a too common story for even non-rare conditions (see: every person researching women’s or children’s health!)
November 6, 2025 at 12:43 AM
Indeed — a too common story for even non-rare conditions (see: every person researching women’s or children’s health!)
Reposted by Kristin Connor
This is still surely to be an issue—even with aggregated/de-identified data.
Instead of the easy & reasonable solution of having say, CIHR analyse the data for the committee based on the Qs they want answered, ensuring privacy and accuracy, some unknown/unskilled person or tool will go fishing! 🚨
Instead of the easy & reasonable solution of having say, CIHR analyse the data for the committee based on the Qs they want answered, ensuring privacy and accuracy, some unknown/unskilled person or tool will go fishing! 🚨
November 6, 2025 at 12:40 AM
This is still surely to be an issue—even with aggregated/de-identified data.
Instead of the easy & reasonable solution of having say, CIHR analyse the data for the committee based on the Qs they want answered, ensuring privacy and accuracy, some unknown/unskilled person or tool will go fishing! 🚨
Instead of the easy & reasonable solution of having say, CIHR analyse the data for the committee based on the Qs they want answered, ensuring privacy and accuracy, some unknown/unskilled person or tool will go fishing! 🚨
This is still surely to be an issue—even with aggregated/de-identified data.
Instead of the easy & reasonable solution of having say, CIHR analyse the data for the committee based on the Qs they want answered, ensuring privacy and accuracy, some unknown/unskilled person or tool will go fishing! 🚨
Instead of the easy & reasonable solution of having say, CIHR analyse the data for the committee based on the Qs they want answered, ensuring privacy and accuracy, some unknown/unskilled person or tool will go fishing! 🚨
November 6, 2025 at 12:40 AM
This is still surely to be an issue—even with aggregated/de-identified data.
Instead of the easy & reasonable solution of having say, CIHR analyse the data for the committee based on the Qs they want answered, ensuring privacy and accuracy, some unknown/unskilled person or tool will go fishing! 🚨
Instead of the easy & reasonable solution of having say, CIHR analyse the data for the committee based on the Qs they want answered, ensuring privacy and accuracy, some unknown/unskilled person or tool will go fishing! 🚨
Bernard is amaaaaaazzzzzzIng!!! 🙌🏾
I’m sure this was a fab talk!
I’m sure this was a fab talk!
November 4, 2025 at 7:23 PM
Bernard is amaaaaaazzzzzzIng!!! 🙌🏾
I’m sure this was a fab talk!
I’m sure this was a fab talk!
*edit - last FIVE years
(issue no less serious)
(issue no less serious)
October 30, 2025 at 11:39 PM
*edit - last FIVE years
(issue no less serious)
(issue no less serious)
👏🏻Congrats again @andpru.bsky.social!
And nice pic! 📸
And nice pic! 📸
October 30, 2025 at 11:37 PM
👏🏻Congrats again @andpru.bsky.social!
And nice pic! 📸
And nice pic! 📸
Yes! Contact them and sign this petition here —it’s not just about EDI data! So much personally identifying information for applicants and reviewers will not be protected!
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
Open Letter to Protect Tri-Council EDI Data
Why do we need urgent action to protect our data?
The mandate of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Science and Research is to review and report on topics relating to science and research in ...
docs.google.com
October 30, 2025 at 11:36 PM
Yes! Contact them and sign this petition here —it’s not just about EDI data! So much personally identifying information for applicants and reviewers will not be protected!
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...