Searle’s (imo vacuous) point is narrowly about whether a symbolic algorithm that behaves intelligently also subjectively experiences understanding, not whether such an algorithm can exist.
Searle’s (imo vacuous) point is narrowly about whether a symbolic algorithm that behaves intelligently also subjectively experiences understanding, not whether such an algorithm can exist.
1. Brains create consciousness
2. We don’t know how brains work
3. We do know how computers work
4. Therefore computers can’t create consciousness
At best it’s a cautionary tale about overreliance on intuition in thought experiments
1. Brains create consciousness
2. We don’t know how brains work
3. We do know how computers work
4. Therefore computers can’t create consciousness
At best it’s a cautionary tale about overreliance on intuition in thought experiments