Kelsey Bacharz, MA
@kbacharz.bsky.social
Clinical Psychology Resident in Behavioral Medicine | Caregiving Scientist specializing in YA Caregivers
yacares.org
yacares.org
Reposted by Kelsey Bacharz, MA
Extremely disappointing & cowardly. The American Psychological Association is rescinding diversity requirements. Not due to any actual mandate from the federal government, but only because it may *someday* face pressure from the government www.nytimes.com/2025/03/27/h...
Under Pressure, Psychology Accreditation Board Suspends Diversity Standards
As the Trump administration threatens to strip accrediting bodies of their power, many are scrambling to purge diversity requirements.
www.nytimes.com
March 28, 2025 at 1:16 AM
Extremely disappointing & cowardly. The American Psychological Association is rescinding diversity requirements. Not due to any actual mandate from the federal government, but only because it may *someday* face pressure from the government www.nytimes.com/2025/03/27/h...
Reposted by Kelsey Bacharz, MA
If you’re at #SBM2025 or are an @sbm.org member please sign this petition asking our organization to stand up for members whose federal funds have been terminated - please share and sign by Sat. docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
Petition: SBM Board Sign-On to Lawsuit to Reverse NIH Grant Cancellations
Scientists at SBM have had federal grants canceled.
The ACLU is suing to challenge these cancellations, with APHA and other organizations joining as signatories.
This form collects signatures from S...
docs.google.com
March 27, 2025 at 9:22 PM
If you’re at #SBM2025 or are an @sbm.org member please sign this petition asking our organization to stand up for members whose federal funds have been terminated - please share and sign by Sat. docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1F...
Reposted by Kelsey Bacharz, MA
Juat something to keep spirits up at SBM conference and people are speaking up #TERMINATEDSCIENCE
March 27, 2025 at 7:53 PM
Juat something to keep spirits up at SBM conference and people are speaking up #TERMINATEDSCIENCE
Reposted by Kelsey Bacharz, MA
By attacking science:
We are less safe because science informs national security and medical care.
We are less prosperous because science drives innovation and economic benefit.
We are less free because science and democracy depend on the liberty to ask questions, and seek and share knowledge.
We are less safe because science informs national security and medical care.
We are less prosperous because science drives innovation and economic benefit.
We are less free because science and democracy depend on the liberty to ask questions, and seek and share knowledge.
March 19, 2025 at 2:21 PM
By attacking science:
We are less safe because science informs national security and medical care.
We are less prosperous because science drives innovation and economic benefit.
We are less free because science and democracy depend on the liberty to ask questions, and seek and share knowledge.
We are less safe because science informs national security and medical care.
We are less prosperous because science drives innovation and economic benefit.
We are less free because science and democracy depend on the liberty to ask questions, and seek and share knowledge.
March 7, 2025 at 6:44 PM