@kazdee.bsky.social
Is there any reason (other than Gorsuch's disapproval) that lower courts can't nip this in the bud by refusing to extend an unexplained decision to any case other than one presenting exactly the same facts?
October 2, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Is there any reason (other than Gorsuch's disapproval) that lower courts can't nip this in the bud by refusing to extend an unexplained decision to any case other than one presenting exactly the same facts?
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
April 15, 2025 at 1:08 AM
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
April 15, 2025 at 1:05 AM
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
April 14, 2025 at 7:32 PM
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
April 14, 2025 at 6:41 PM
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
April 14, 2025 at 6:39 PM
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
April 14, 2025 at 6:33 PM
Trump wants to send people to jails in foreign countries; Bukele wants to offer those jails. Supreme Court should make clear it is unconstitutional to send any person to a jail that has no opportunity for return to the U.S. if needed for the administration of justice. That would get Garcia back.
Greenland should just ignore her. She can come over and watch dog races and whatnot. The government doesn't need to treat her any differently than they would treat me, unless the U.S. requests some additional security. Then they should ask for payment in advance.
March 24, 2025 at 2:57 PM
Greenland should just ignore her. She can come over and watch dog races and whatnot. The government doesn't need to treat her any differently than they would treat me, unless the U.S. requests some additional security. Then they should ask for payment in advance.
May I ask: Does the judge have the power to *dismiss with prejudice*, instead of dismissing without prejudice (coercive) or refusing to dismiss (problematic). TV news pundits do not seem to be considering the possibility of dismissal with prejudice as an option for the judge. Why?
February 16, 2025 at 9:20 PM
May I ask: Does the judge have the power to *dismiss with prejudice*, instead of dismissing without prejudice (coercive) or refusing to dismiss (problematic). TV news pundits do not seem to be considering the possibility of dismissal with prejudice as an option for the judge. Why?