Katherine Wikoff
@katherinewikoff.bsky.social
Professor at MSOE in MKE. PhD in English (rhetoric). Digital storytelling, digital society, content design, film/media studies, political science, communication.
Blog: KatherineWikoff.com
Blog: KatherineWikoff.com
Reposted by Katherine Wikoff
AI-augmented writing improves readability, language diversity, and informativeness, but lacks details and insights. Reviewers struggle to distinguish human and AI writing. Guidelines should promote impartial evaluations, regardless of biases against GenAI.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
The great AI witch hunt: Reviewers’ perception and (Mis)conception of generative AI in research writing
Generative AI (GenAI) use in research writing is growing fast. However, it is unclear how peer reviewers recognize or misjudge AI-augmented manuscript…
www.sciencedirect.com
December 20, 2024 at 11:28 PM
AI-augmented writing improves readability, language diversity, and informativeness, but lacks details and insights. Reviewers struggle to distinguish human and AI writing. Guidelines should promote impartial evaluations, regardless of biases against GenAI.
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...
www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...