I don’t think so.

Maybe easier to teach an AI to say I’m not sure? arxiv.org/pdf/2502.13962

That feeling when you’re about to deep dive into your area of expertise to explain a joke …

I did it; hope you’re sitting down.

Republicans do something outrageous and extreme, their opponents respond by critiquing each other.

Providence, Rochester, New Haven

I love this. I make this same point to anyone who will listen: teaching high school students to debate is a terrible use of education. It deliberately schools them in insincerity. The 'how to be toxic club,' to avoid real talk. I pointed out to Wurman speaking at BU that this is not debate club.

PS 100% you could be the original source of the argument.

In discussing whether we should be scoring points, or getting the story right, I asked if he'd ask the NYT for a correction. He said it didn't warrant it, is my recollection. One other thing: I think he said the opportunity to write this in NYT shaped the project. Again, confirm elsewhere please.

each explicable (diplomatic immnty, e.g.). You should call him, you'd have a better conversation about his concession than I. I believe he said this was the one part of the op-ed that gave him "heartburn" is how I remember it (could have been a like term, headache/insomnia, but I recall heartburn).

1/2 I'm not on x and I am not a historian. I read a number of pieces about the op-ed organized and linked by a scholar, and one linked to Calvin's case. I think the op-ed itself does as well. The idea was that open war is required to negate, not simply being Alien [sic]. Other exceptions also ..

What I saw was a future federal judge

I'm persuaded that it is, but on this one point, Wurman conceded something wrong with it.

But he did concede that the way he'd characterized amity in the NYT did give him some heartburn. Not enough to correct.

At BU last week, Wurman gave me a pointed "if I could finish my thought" because I interrupted his answer to my Q to say his answer was again mischaracterizing. I had prefaced my question by saying we are not at debate club scoring points and concessions. I asked him to issue a correction. A: No.