@karel.online
daughters dad, married to a flawless being, ruthless idealist, involuntary contrarian, ballistic atheist, creator, investor, programmer
Is this the same lady who promoted the idea that the 1969 moon landing was "completely faked"?
November 25, 2025 at 6:07 PM
Is this the same lady who promoted the idea that the 1969 moon landing was "completely faked"?
The ever-improving skill of ufologists in avoiding a single hint of evidence - even when an alien bothers to land at the very place humanity built for landing - is breathtaking.
Fortunately, the cognitive situation of American presidents is no barrier to celestial being interventions.
Fortunately, the cognitive situation of American presidents is no barrier to celestial being interventions.
November 23, 2025 at 3:26 PM
The ever-improving skill of ufologists in avoiding a single hint of evidence - even when an alien bothers to land at the very place humanity built for landing - is breathtaking.
Fortunately, the cognitive situation of American presidents is no barrier to celestial being interventions.
Fortunately, the cognitive situation of American presidents is no barrier to celestial being interventions.
The ever-improving skill of ufologists in avoiding a single hint of evidence - even when an alien bothers to land at the very place humanity built for landing - is breathtaking.
Fortunately, the cognitive situation of American presidents is no barrier to celestial being interventions.
Fortunately, the cognitive situation of American presidents is no barrier to celestial being interventions.
November 23, 2025 at 3:26 PM
The ever-improving skill of ufologists in avoiding a single hint of evidence - even when an alien bothers to land at the very place humanity built for landing - is breathtaking.
Fortunately, the cognitive situation of American presidents is no barrier to celestial being interventions.
Fortunately, the cognitive situation of American presidents is no barrier to celestial being interventions.
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
November 23, 2025 at 2:33 PM
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
November 23, 2025 at 2:33 PM
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
November 23, 2025 at 2:32 PM
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
November 23, 2025 at 2:32 PM
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
November 23, 2025 at 2:31 PM
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
November 23, 2025 at 2:31 PM
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
November 23, 2025 at 2:31 PM
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
November 23, 2025 at 2:31 PM
So it seems that what attracted renowned theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss to former physics teacher Jeffrey Epstein was not a shared interest in physics.
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
In what universe could physics be so unlucky?
I see. That would at least be a failure that is humanly understandable.
November 11, 2025 at 12:39 PM
I see. That would at least be a failure that is humanly understandable.
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
November 11, 2025 at 12:27 PM
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
November 11, 2025 at 12:26 PM
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
November 11, 2025 at 12:26 PM
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
November 11, 2025 at 12:26 PM
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
November 11, 2025 at 12:26 PM
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
November 11, 2025 at 12:26 PM
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
November 11, 2025 at 12:26 PM
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
November 11, 2025 at 12:26 PM
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.
November 11, 2025 at 12:25 PM
The decision by a few Democrats to assist government rests on the assumption that they can do so simply because they temporarily hold formal power. This reflects a primitive confusion of responsibility with power - a stance that, whether intentional or not, treats fascism as negotiable.