Kathleen Commons
kabcommons.bsky.social
Kathleen Commons
@kabcommons.bsky.social
Researching immigration control in 17C England, and what it tells us about citizenship now and then. Co-convenor @ihr.bsky.social Migration and Mobility Seminar. Co-Director, Room to Heal, trustee @afrilcharity.bsky.social, Abigail Housing.
😱
October 8, 2025 at 4:16 PM
Our next seminar will be with the wonderful Anne Irfan's paper on 'Structural displacement and enforced immobility: Palestinian refugee history in Gaza since 1948' on 28 October. Sign up here: www.history.ac.uk/news-events/... or join our mailing list: forms.gle/8JtLfYwH1MYL...
Structural displacement and enforced immobility: Palestinian refugee history in Gaza since 1948
www.history.ac.uk
October 1, 2025 at 6:52 AM
Congratulations! (Belatedly) - and I do!
September 16, 2025 at 1:03 PM
Feels a little bit on the nose in today's discourse, though I think the idea that stronger rights for subjects enables refugee protection is perhaps a (small) indication of a way to think about refugee protection as a net positive - for citizens and migrants
September 8, 2025 at 4:18 PM
While at the same time, those seeking to deny protection to Huguenots argued that to extend rights to migrants was a denigration of subjects' rights.
September 8, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Migrants' rights were and are enmeshed with subjects'/citizens' rights, but in complex ways. In late 17thC England, assertions of subjects' rights in some ways opened up the possibility of extending protection - and rights - to persecuted migrants
September 8, 2025 at 4:18 PM
Or, in the case of the Glorious Revolution, break allegiance and settle the crown on someone else?
September 8, 2025 at 4:18 PM
The 40 year debate over general naturalisation highlights the ways that extending 'refugee protection' was contingent upon differing views of 'natural allegiance': under what circumstances is it legitimate to break allegiance with a monarch and settle elsewhere
September 8, 2025 at 4:18 PM