@jwr99.bsky.social
More specifically -- unjust persecution by Biden
December 25, 2025 at 4:31 AM
More specifically -- unjust persecution by Biden
I thought I was already reading from it daily when I read my daily news feed
December 25, 2025 at 2:12 AM
I thought I was already reading from it daily when I read my daily news feed
If there's anything Trump should have taught politicians, one's work most definitely does not just speak for itself.
You have to thump your chest.
You have to thump your chest.
December 24, 2025 at 4:08 AM
If there's anything Trump should have taught politicians, one's work most definitely does not just speak for itself.
You have to thump your chest.
You have to thump your chest.
Winning the 19th century, losing the 21st century
December 22, 2025 at 10:02 PM
Winning the 19th century, losing the 21st century
Where in California?
December 22, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Where in California?
I'm guessing that companies like UnitedHealthcare and Aetna didn't contribute to the ballroom.
December 20, 2025 at 7:16 PM
I'm guessing that companies like UnitedHealthcare and Aetna didn't contribute to the ballroom.
Also, many are eating a lot of the tariff costs to avoid losing customers while hoping the tariffs will get TACO'd, but that can't go on forever.
Entrepreneurs spend lots of time working through tariff uncertainty; time that could have been spent working on efficiency and attracting new customers.
Entrepreneurs spend lots of time working through tariff uncertainty; time that could have been spent working on efficiency and attracting new customers.
December 20, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Also, many are eating a lot of the tariff costs to avoid losing customers while hoping the tariffs will get TACO'd, but that can't go on forever.
Entrepreneurs spend lots of time working through tariff uncertainty; time that could have been spent working on efficiency and attracting new customers.
Entrepreneurs spend lots of time working through tariff uncertainty; time that could have been spent working on efficiency and attracting new customers.
People voted against Harris because they thought she wouldn't do what she promised
People voted FOR Trump because they thought he wouldn't do what he promised
People voted FOR Trump because they thought he wouldn't do what he promised
December 20, 2025 at 7:01 PM
People voted against Harris because they thought she wouldn't do what she promised
People voted FOR Trump because they thought he wouldn't do what he promised
People voted FOR Trump because they thought he wouldn't do what he promised
The smartest bubble companies in the 90s knew their real (limited) value and used their considerable assets and valuations to buy "real" companies. I liked to call such companies Big Empty Tents that they filled with real companies.
December 19, 2025 at 8:22 PM
The smartest bubble companies in the 90s knew their real (limited) value and used their considerable assets and valuations to buy "real" companies. I liked to call such companies Big Empty Tents that they filled with real companies.
My parents had one -- 40 years ago
December 19, 2025 at 4:18 AM
My parents had one -- 40 years ago
A guy named Obama focused on deporting violent immigrants and recent immigrants who bypassed the rules while working on legal status for those here a long time, starting with those who came as kids.
Though many in his camp disagreed, seems he was pretty popular overall.
Though many in his camp disagreed, seems he was pretty popular overall.
December 17, 2025 at 3:37 AM
A guy named Obama focused on deporting violent immigrants and recent immigrants who bypassed the rules while working on legal status for those here a long time, starting with those who came as kids.
Though many in his camp disagreed, seems he was pretty popular overall.
Though many in his camp disagreed, seems he was pretty popular overall.
Of course not. But it would have kept him from making things far worse pushing to repeal and we'd be back to where insurance would drop a small company if they didn't take the kid with leukemia whose parent works there off the plan.
He hates anything "Obama", so take that out of the equation.
He hates anything "Obama", so take that out of the equation.
December 9, 2025 at 6:14 PM
Of course not. But it would have kept him from making things far worse pushing to repeal and we'd be back to where insurance would drop a small company if they didn't take the kid with leukemia whose parent works there off the plan.
He hates anything "Obama", so take that out of the equation.
He hates anything "Obama", so take that out of the equation.
Excellent work on his floor on the economy. He's already lost those who thought he'd only go after violent criminals and pardon non-violent J6ers. As you say, to go below that would be something that further erodes his base with something like starting a war with Venezuela or stonewalling on Epstein
December 5, 2025 at 6:53 PM
Excellent work on his floor on the economy. He's already lost those who thought he'd only go after violent criminals and pardon non-violent J6ers. As you say, to go below that would be something that further erodes his base with something like starting a war with Venezuela or stonewalling on Epstein
I said in 2017 that if they just took the existing ACA and renamed it "TrumpCare", he'd be all for it.
December 5, 2025 at 6:45 PM
I said in 2017 that if they just took the existing ACA and renamed it "TrumpCare", he'd be all for it.
Last I saw it was 70-30 against (don't remember who)
December 5, 2025 at 6:43 PM
Last I saw it was 70-30 against (don't remember who)
You can rig your elections for partisan reasons any time you want, but you can only do it for racial reasons within 2 years of the next congressional election
December 5, 2025 at 6:42 PM
You can rig your elections for partisan reasons any time you want, but you can only do it for racial reasons within 2 years of the next congressional election
Even if you go with the stated $1000/car savings (on an average $50,000 new car), how long would it take to lose that savings back in having to buy more fuel due to lower fuel mileage? Pretty sure a lot sooner than the length of an average car loan.
December 4, 2025 at 4:06 PM
Even if you go with the stated $1000/car savings (on an average $50,000 new car), how long would it take to lose that savings back in having to buy more fuel due to lower fuel mileage? Pretty sure a lot sooner than the length of an average car loan.
💯There's a pretty wide gulf between "Would you use this?" and "Would you pay to use this?".
December 4, 2025 at 4:20 AM
💯There's a pretty wide gulf between "Would you use this?" and "Would you pay to use this?".
idk; I think J.L. Partners/Daily Mail -8 is worse
November 26, 2025 at 4:57 AM
idk; I think J.L. Partners/Daily Mail -8 is worse
Thank you for your work in exposing the tyranny of one-dimensional left-right political discourse.
November 20, 2025 at 4:37 PM
Thank you for your work in exposing the tyranny of one-dimensional left-right political discourse.
They need to give him a bigger gold bar than the guys from Switzerland gave him, a week before he lowered tariffs on their products.
November 19, 2025 at 10:46 PM
They need to give him a bigger gold bar than the guys from Switzerland gave him, a week before he lowered tariffs on their products.
I swear if the GOP would take the current ACA with enhancement and release the exact same thing and call it "TrumpCare", it would pass.
November 17, 2025 at 2:39 AM
I swear if the GOP would take the current ACA with enhancement and release the exact same thing and call it "TrumpCare", it would pass.
Also 2016.
Also 2008.
Also 2008.
November 15, 2025 at 1:20 AM
Also 2016.
Also 2008.
Also 2008.
They don't consider people who live in multi-family housing real people either
November 15, 2025 at 1:17 AM
They don't consider people who live in multi-family housing real people either
So you're bringing full disclosure with honest analysis. I think they'll kick you off social media
November 14, 2025 at 6:37 PM
So you're bringing full disclosure with honest analysis. I think they'll kick you off social media