Jon Bell
@jusbellum.bsky.social
I'm not important and don't really matter. My group is not important and matters as much as I do. Our words stand on their own. Citing authorities as support for a position is logic fault. Think for yourself.
Hey Murph!
We found this graphic, purporting to quote Grant, your POTUS 18. Don't know if it's accurate. Even if not, the sentiment seems to be spot on as re the shithole USA is in right now and the bigger/deeper shithole USA seems hellbent toward getting itself into.
Good Luck and Sit Vis Tecum
We found this graphic, purporting to quote Grant, your POTUS 18. Don't know if it's accurate. Even if not, the sentiment seems to be spot on as re the shithole USA is in right now and the bigger/deeper shithole USA seems hellbent toward getting itself into.
Good Luck and Sit Vis Tecum
November 20, 2025 at 4:46 PM
Hey Murph!
We found this graphic, purporting to quote Grant, your POTUS 18. Don't know if it's accurate. Even if not, the sentiment seems to be spot on as re the shithole USA is in right now and the bigger/deeper shithole USA seems hellbent toward getting itself into.
Good Luck and Sit Vis Tecum
We found this graphic, purporting to quote Grant, your POTUS 18. Don't know if it's accurate. Even if not, the sentiment seems to be spot on as re the shithole USA is in right now and the bigger/deeper shithole USA seems hellbent toward getting itself into.
Good Luck and Sit Vis Tecum
Should be impeached and removed?
Sure - In a rational, clear thinking, enlightened society, where the elected officials involved in the impeachment process were also rational, clear thinking, and enlightened.
But, you don't have either.
You do have Article V, US Const.
Use it.
Sure - In a rational, clear thinking, enlightened society, where the elected officials involved in the impeachment process were also rational, clear thinking, and enlightened.
But, you don't have either.
You do have Article V, US Const.
Use it.
November 20, 2025 at 3:21 PM
Should be impeached and removed?
Sure - In a rational, clear thinking, enlightened society, where the elected officials involved in the impeachment process were also rational, clear thinking, and enlightened.
But, you don't have either.
You do have Article V, US Const.
Use it.
Sure - In a rational, clear thinking, enlightened society, where the elected officials involved in the impeachment process were also rational, clear thinking, and enlightened.
But, you don't have either.
You do have Article V, US Const.
Use it.
The Courts may indeed serve as a vital check on, inter alia, 'executive power'.
However, the Courts are mere convenience. A middle-man, if you will, to do what society/the people can do themselves.
So, perhaps you could not rag on the Courts so much and motivate the people to do it themselves.
However, the Courts are mere convenience. A middle-man, if you will, to do what society/the people can do themselves.
So, perhaps you could not rag on the Courts so much and motivate the people to do it themselves.
November 19, 2025 at 2:23 PM
The Courts may indeed serve as a vital check on, inter alia, 'executive power'.
However, the Courts are mere convenience. A middle-man, if you will, to do what society/the people can do themselves.
So, perhaps you could not rag on the Courts so much and motivate the people to do it themselves.
However, the Courts are mere convenience. A middle-man, if you will, to do what society/the people can do themselves.
So, perhaps you could not rag on the Courts so much and motivate the people to do it themselves.
See this re matters speech. Nota Bene: A thesis/argument within/underlying the author's treatise is that USA is an open society. We suggest you might want to examine that thesis/argument.
November 18, 2025 at 3:07 PM
See this re matters speech. Nota Bene: A thesis/argument within/underlying the author's treatise is that USA is an open society. We suggest you might want to examine that thesis/argument.
Factually accurate? Perhaps.
Meaningful?
Meaningful?
November 12, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Factually accurate? Perhaps.
Meaningful?
Meaningful?
Reich seems to hold the view 'regimented' is good and 'undisciplined' is not so good.
We hold the view neither is good and neither is bad, where either can be good or bad depending.
That said, we do subscribe to Sir Pratchett's view re the matter, and hold 'undisciplined' tends to be better.
We hold the view neither is good and neither is bad, where either can be good or bad depending.
That said, we do subscribe to Sir Pratchett's view re the matter, and hold 'undisciplined' tends to be better.
November 12, 2025 at 4:39 PM
Reich seems to hold the view 'regimented' is good and 'undisciplined' is not so good.
We hold the view neither is good and neither is bad, where either can be good or bad depending.
That said, we do subscribe to Sir Pratchett's view re the matter, and hold 'undisciplined' tends to be better.
We hold the view neither is good and neither is bad, where either can be good or bad depending.
That said, we do subscribe to Sir Pratchett's view re the matter, and hold 'undisciplined' tends to be better.
Trump's plan is this. We don't like Trump's plan.
November 11, 2025 at 6:14 PM
Trump's plan is this. We don't like Trump's plan.
Mr. Egger,
A lot in your article is spot on.
Doesn't change fact that sometimes you gotta pick your battles.
A lot in your article is spot on.
Doesn't change fact that sometimes you gotta pick your battles.
November 11, 2025 at 5:09 AM
Mr. Egger,
A lot in your article is spot on.
Doesn't change fact that sometimes you gotta pick your battles.
A lot in your article is spot on.
Doesn't change fact that sometimes you gotta pick your battles.
You may be in such a fight.
However, not all battles are worth the costs of success.
However, not all battles are worth the costs of success.
November 11, 2025 at 4:25 AM
You may be in such a fight.
However, not all battles are worth the costs of success.
However, not all battles are worth the costs of success.
For this Veterans Day, consider this:
There are those among you who have seen shit they can't unsee, heard shit they can't unhear, smelled shit they can't unsmell, where you can't possibly imagine that shit.
They did what was asked of them.
Do your part: Don't let what they did be in vain.
There are those among you who have seen shit they can't unsee, heard shit they can't unhear, smelled shit they can't unsmell, where you can't possibly imagine that shit.
They did what was asked of them.
Do your part: Don't let what they did be in vain.
November 11, 2025 at 4:03 AM
For this Veterans Day, consider this:
There are those among you who have seen shit they can't unsee, heard shit they can't unhear, smelled shit they can't unsmell, where you can't possibly imagine that shit.
They did what was asked of them.
Do your part: Don't let what they did be in vain.
There are those among you who have seen shit they can't unsee, heard shit they can't unhear, smelled shit they can't unsmell, where you can't possibly imagine that shit.
They did what was asked of them.
Do your part: Don't let what they did be in vain.
This joke is a bit old, but still serves:
November 8, 2025 at 11:19 PM
This joke is a bit old, but still serves:
'Federal immigration agents pepper-sprayed an infant today'!?!?
November 8, 2025 at 10:00 PM
'Federal immigration agents pepper-sprayed an infant today'!?!?
Unless some Courts start issuing some contempt judgments, your 'Judge Rules Trump Defied ...' will be this:
November 6, 2025 at 10:08 PM
Unless some Courts start issuing some contempt judgments, your 'Judge Rules Trump Defied ...' will be this:
'Now, I say that as a jealous guardian of the legislative branch of government, Article 1.'!?!?
November 6, 2025 at 1:26 PM
'Now, I say that as a jealous guardian of the legislative branch of government, Article 1.'!?!?
For what it may be worth, we like this observation from Sir Terence Pratchett OBE re your 'messy coalition' characterization:
November 5, 2025 at 3:38 AM
For what it may be worth, we like this observation from Sir Terence Pratchett OBE re your 'messy coalition' characterization:
Here's our 'two cents' re your legacy argument:
October 29, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Here's our 'two cents' re your legacy argument:
Change 'causative association' to 'correlation' and you get this:
October 29, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Change 'causative association' to 'correlation' and you get this:
What's your solution, proposed response, etc. (besides fostering, promoting, inciting discontent)?
Sincere inquiry.
Sincere inquiry.
October 26, 2025 at 6:14 PM
What's your solution, proposed response, etc. (besides fostering, promoting, inciting discontent)?
Sincere inquiry.
Sincere inquiry.
Bigotry may be key to Trumpism.
However, it is important, in not critical, to note that Trumpism is simply playing off and taking advantage of the bigotry that is USA.
That is, USA's bigotry is fueling Trumpism. Trumpism is not causing/creating USA's bigotry.
However, it is important, in not critical, to note that Trumpism is simply playing off and taking advantage of the bigotry that is USA.
That is, USA's bigotry is fueling Trumpism. Trumpism is not causing/creating USA's bigotry.
October 26, 2025 at 2:51 PM
Bigotry may be key to Trumpism.
However, it is important, in not critical, to note that Trumpism is simply playing off and taking advantage of the bigotry that is USA.
That is, USA's bigotry is fueling Trumpism. Trumpism is not causing/creating USA's bigotry.
However, it is important, in not critical, to note that Trumpism is simply playing off and taking advantage of the bigotry that is USA.
That is, USA's bigotry is fueling Trumpism. Trumpism is not causing/creating USA's bigotry.
You hold more authority by reason of Art. V, US Const., than all the institutions in USA combined, minor or major doesn't matter.
Learn to use it.
Also, see this ->
Learn to use it.
Also, see this ->
October 26, 2025 at 2:58 AM
You hold more authority by reason of Art. V, US Const., than all the institutions in USA combined, minor or major doesn't matter.
Learn to use it.
Also, see this ->
Learn to use it.
Also, see this ->