I did not think about this aspect (why would I, I have no idea who is a paid member of the W3C :laughing:), but this is a potentially concerning data point.

> There are only two organisations that are active in the fediverse that are a paid member of the W3C: Meta and the Social Web Foundation […]

_16 January 2026_

* Re-enabled Anubis after adjusting some rules.
* After the last update 17 Nov, I actually disabled Anubis again because it was interfering with logins (perhaps this is a known issue? Anyhow, proxying POST requests directly to NodeBB fixed the issue

@gargron@mastodon.social I realized I was not in the same league of software developer as my colleagues when I built a PC and put in 4GB of RAM while they'd go 16 and up.

This was back in the day before Electron apps, so think Notepad++ and Sublime Text, truky lightweight stuff.

You are […]

Hi @silverpill@mitra.social right;

1. `Move` and `Remove` are explicit actions concerning membership of a context in an audience.
2. `Update` is overly broad and receivers would have to _infer_ audience change based on what the updated object contains (e.g. Audience _Y_ is suddenly missing […]

@bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de in the relevant issue in Mbin's issue tracker raises a wording concern: "resolvable context" is an unfamiliar term to those who have not read through FEP 7888.

I will update the FEP to make this definition more explicit […]

Tagging relevant parties:

* @rimu@piefed.social of Piefed
* @nutomic@lemmy.ml of Lemmy
* @bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de and @melroy@kbin.melroy.org of Mbin

The submission of the FEP and timing of this post are intentional as there are now two implementors supporting (part of) this FEP.

* NodeBB as of v4.7.0, and Piefed as of v1.5

As the implementors work through any issues, the FEP and this topic will be updated to reflect those changes.

This is now implemented and will launch with v4.8.0 on Wednesday.

@ricci@discuss.systems @silverpill@mitra.social

I haven't exhaustively tested BridgyFed compatibility, but following the bridgyfed user means your posts are bridged through, but you are able to find and follow any bridged bsky user from NodeBB.

Hi @alexshendi@rollenspiel.social you can access the forum from your browser @ https://postcall.pub

@flancia.org@bsky.brid.gy NodeBB can connect to BlueSky if you follow the bridgyfed user (as you likely did from bsky)

Med-Mastodon is back online but if you'd like to try a medicine focused federated forum, check out https://postcall.pub 🙂

@laurenshof@indieweb.social it certainly doesn't matter a much as it's made out to.

Back in the day I remember when you registered for a hotmail account you could choose between several domains... it was entirely for vanity, but this is similar.

Obviously not the same because instance […]

@glocq@mathstodon.xyz I really found this helpful:

https://seb.jambor.dev/posts/understanding-activitypub/

And testing stuff against activitypub.academy 👍

@jik@federate.social huh, that's... funny, NodeBB can't pull that post either....

@ricci@discuss.systems we will implement and ping back when ready. Likely for v4.9.0

@linc@phpc.social interesting!

So you can back to from Discord, but how would this be output into a forum?

Inquiring minds want to know 🙂

@ricci@discuss.systems that makes sense. I'll double check that ActivityPub as a protocol is only sent back if enabled.

cc @dansup@mastodon.social

@ricci@discuss.systems

`"nodebb", # Note: only gets counted if 'activitypub' is listed in protocols`

I love how this is my software and I didn't even know this.

@sam@break3.social you're right, that would definitely be preferable!

Like being able to log in to Mastodon from a Peertube account, or browse Lemmy while logged in from NodeBB.

I'd love to work on this in 2026! Realizing it would require lots of interop work between software though. Such is […]