JuliasGreenIsle
LightNews LightNews
juliaknows.bsky.social
JuliasGreenIsle
@juliaknows.bsky.social
230 followers 360 following 250 posts
From Lowell MA. Survived domestic violence in a fight to the death. Today, I fight FOR women. I fight AGAINST the cops. I’ve lived a wild life. Wall Street high finance, drugs, sex, depravity, violence…I also fight New Hampshire. Live free or die trying.
Posts Replies Media Videos
juliaknows.bsky.social
I had one made. Old man of the mountain. Live free or die trying.
May 23, 2025 at 5:41 AM
juliaknows.bsky.social
How many illegal immigrants in NH. Give me a percentage.
May 23, 2025 at 5:40 AM
juliaknows.bsky.social
Hey whats the total illegal immigrant population in NH? Do tell.
May 23, 2025 at 5:40 AM
juliaknows.bsky.social
She’s got mar-a-lago stars in her eyes. She’s a fraud. Look at her playing dress up as Kristi noem.
May 23, 2025 at 5:38 AM
juliaknows.bsky.social
And again today with this
May 20, 2025 at 6:15 AM
Reposted by JuliasGreenIsle
wandrme.paxex.aero
This afternoon I filed a lawsuit against Avelo for its efforts to limit free speech in the form of the #avelNO billboards near New Haven Airport.

I'm seeking a declaratory judgement from the Court affirming my right to protest Avelo's actions, including using the company's name in the protest.
5. Miller brings this Action seeking a declaratory judgment that his 7 campaign does not infringe Avelo's trademarks, trade dress, or copyright, which it does not for at least three reasons. First, Miller's speech cannot possibly infringe Avelo's marks because it is entitled to protection under the Rogers First Amendment test-Miller's speech does not function as a trademark, it clearly mocks Avelo's trademark, and it is therefore paradigmatic protected speech. Second, Miller's speech was not "in connection with" the sale of goods or services as required by the trademark laws under clear Ninth Circuit precedent. And, finally, Miller's speech was a textbook example of nominative fair use (for both trademark and copyright purposes) and could not possibly have confused any reasonable person about the source of airline passenger service. Miller also seeks relief from Avelo's tortious interference with his billboard contract. 6. Avelo is free to disagree with Miller, to criticize him, and to advocate its position to the public. It is free to call Miller a naif, a fool, or worse. But it is not free to use baseless threats of litigation to suppress Miller's criticism. This Court should declare that Miller does not violate Avelo's copyright, trademark, and trade dress, and allow the public to continue seeing Miller's free speech.
May 16, 2025 at 7:02 PM