Okay this I can get behind. This is interesting

Selling comes in many forms. Be it a provision of healthcare for the duration, or supporting her financially so she doesn't have to work, or paying her in kind (gifts, holidays, education access). Don't assume that she didn't benefit

So she was paid in kind. And you don't see a problem? You don't see how exploitative it is?

Physical labour can be done by anyone. Giving birth can only be done by women. There is an inherent exploitation of women in this. Children are awaiting adoption, there's no need to rent a womb.

And they are sole occupancy.

Women's bodies are not for rent. Adoption agencies should be for the good of the child, not based on religion.

There are children already born in need of loving homes. There is no need to rent a womb.

We don't know her personal circumstances. "Force" can be anything that left her with no choice but to do this. Pregnancy and childbirth are dangerous.

I think about the mother, whose womb was used for this. I think about the risks she went through during pregnancy, and the changes to her body. I think about the pain she endured giving birth. Women's bodies are not for sale.

Considering that people were calling in bomb threats to voting centres in order to suppress turnout, this would be welcomed if true.