Jules McHamish
LightNews LightNews
banner
julesmchamish.bsky.social
Jules McHamish
@julesmchamish.bsky.social
910 followers 2.2K following 1.5K posts
🍒Mum & wife #afcb & sometimes #pusb-Maths geek-Politics-I find some things funny-Bournemouth UK-❤️Station Eleven-I carried a🦒across the Irish Sea at the old place!
Posts Replies Media Videos
julesmchamish.bsky.social
a man and a woman are running in a kitchen with a picture frame on the door
ALT: a man and a woman are running in a kitchen with a picture frame on the door
media.tenor.com
November 11, 2025 at 10:27 AM
julesmchamish.bsky.social
Literally 2 of my favourite repeat watches!
November 10, 2025 at 6:20 PM
Reposted by Jules McHamish
russellengland.bsky.social
The Vimes boot theory

[From "Men at Arms" by Terry Pratchett]
The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles. But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that’d still be keeping his feet dry in ten years’ time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet. - Men at Arms
November 3, 2025 at 8:49 AM
julesmchamish.bsky.social
Where’s 19? I bet it was ‘smoked your dad’s B&Hs washed down with white lightning!’
November 10, 2025 at 7:06 AM
Reposted by Jules McHamish
henryriley1.bsky.social
@matthew-wright.bsky.social some of the vintage cabs!
November 9, 2025 at 10:36 AM
julesmchamish.bsky.social
In plain sight
November 8, 2025 at 7:21 PM
julesmchamish.bsky.social
“Lets carrying on trying to get votes from people who will never vote for us, and then the people who did vote for us last time, but have been sold a pup, will be forced to vote for us just to keep the other guy out.”

is quite the take from Labour. What could go wrong?
November 5, 2025 at 5:37 PM
julesmchamish.bsky.social
I still say Hennes & Mauritz instead of H&M and it annoys my daughter no end!
November 4, 2025 at 5:29 PM