is one legally allowed to use this as an album cover
asking for a friend

this story’s wild because the guy might not be part of the family- he just changed his name, and was mysteriously wealthy

still- suspect has upgraded to a mountain bike

closing argument was a good one today: one of the purposes of the law is for minors to ‘embrace their biological sex,’ and that this treatment promotes the ‘distain of their biological sex.’

There’s not any medical purpose in that reasoning. Any child with ‘distain’ is ‘wrong’ in their eyes.

this shouldn’t be a judiciary OR legislature choice, this should be the choice of the doctor and parents, no?

‘parental rights here isn’t under consideration or threat here’ *INCORRECT BUZZER NOISE*

~they aren’t under threat but let’s remove these choices for parents!~

‘you can’t use testosterone for purely cosmetic purposes’ uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh *incorrect buzzer noise*

sotomayor laying into the Tennessee council is a relief

Alito and now Barrett are questioning if transgender status is immutable.

Let me just stuff my transgender-ness in this drawer real quick.

Kavanaugh is saying that people ‘will be hurt with either decision, and we need to weigh both sides,’ citing those who regret the gender affirming care they receive.

It’s already been established that the rate of regret for post-puberty GAC is *less than 1%.*

…perhaps (yes)