We argue that overview is not a static feature of tech—it’s a situated achievement shaped by data work, professional roles, and organizational boundaries.

Thanks to our collaborator, reviewers & colleagues
If you're working on digital health, chronic care, or STS—let’s connect!
#STS #DigitalHealth #DataWork #SAMBLIK #DiabetesCare #IHC2025

📄 Read the full article:
Stage, J.T. & Langstrup, H. (2025)
European Society for Socially Embedded Technologies (EUSSET)
🔗 doi.org/10.48340/IHC...

SAMBLIK promises seamless data access. But overview isn’t just about access—it’s about trust, relevance, and context.
Sometimes it helps. Sometimes it adds to the burden. Sometimes it’s ignored.

Based on ethnographic fieldwork, we identify 4 enactments of overview via SAMBLIK:
1️⃣ Expedient overview
2️⃣ Glancing overview
3️⃣ Care-continuum overview
4️⃣ Non-overview
Each reflects different data experiences & clinical realities.

In Denmark, health data is in principle available across sectors. But many clinicians still feel the overview is missing.
We ask: What does “overview” actually mean in practice? And how is it enacted through data work?

There have been attempts internationally, indeed. What I find interesting is how those experiences and knowledge might not be incorporated into a Danish context, with a lack of organisational support and ideas about prober practice which could reproduce diamental ways of doing PPI.

It's still a working paper - hopefully It will come out soon. While waiting for the paper to come out, you might be interested in reading more about tacit social expectations in who gets 'access': www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

Hej Gritt! Jeg tænker at det kommer med tiden. Jeg ser at flere forskningscentre viser lokalt interesse for det - og så må vi lokalt give en hånd med at vise hvordan det er muligt at overfører ens opslag og de personer man fra Twitter hertil gennem!

Great, Graham. Could you put me on the list?

Great to see you here, Daniel. (and your dog ofc!

So great! Could you add me :-)

Could you add me :-)

There is something about qualitative research that is not easily replaced by AI either! For example, with interviews, transcription models do often not include tonation, pauses and other important signifiers for a great interview.

Could you please add me :-)