As a psychopath, emotionally disturbed Trump often discredits election results he does not like, and he said WITHOUT EVIDENCE that the California ballot measure [canceling Texas Republican gerrymandering] was rigged and that the mail-ballot system was under “very serious legal and criminal review.”

Redrawing maps to squeeze out more safe seats is not part of the ordinary run-up to an election. But when Psychopath Trump demanded that Republican-led states gerrymander their House maps to stave off Democratic control, he shattered decades of settled norms regarding how district lines are drawn.

The justices agreed to hear the case on an EXPEDITED schedule.

The court typically announces its decisions by the end of June or early July, but a decision in this case should come sooner.

ONE: Key Republican justices appeared skeptical of Trump regime’s stance.

TWO: Are tariffs taxes? The justices wanted to know.

THREE: The case has massive implications for presidential power.

FOUR: The president’s other, specific tariff powers.

FIVE: The nondelegation doctrine.

The results came after polls showing that Trump and Republicans have seen their longtime edge on management of the economy evaporate.

The irresponsible focus on tariffs as a wonder drug has given plenty of fodder to Democrats.

“Trump is indifferent to the pain American families are feeling."

Trump himself was not on the ballot, and he never held rallies in either of the states where new governors were elected on Tuesday.

The psychopath was still a central character in the campaigns, a mainstay of the Democrats’ advertising, and their arguments on the stump.

[WHERE DOES THE BUCK STOP?]

"In their family."

"Wal...it IS just down the road from New Orleans."

"Keep your spirits up. The sky is not falling. I repeat, the sky is not falling." [CLUNK]

"Gangs of Billionaires' Island"

The article suggests that the Court is likely NOT to delay the effect of their eventual ruling.

Perhaps a couple of the lackeys doubt their ability to remain on the Court if they reach back to the 19th century once again.

The stakes could hardly be higher. The decision could affect global trade, the U.S. economy, inflation, businesses and the wallets of every American.

The case is the first major test of whether the Court will embrace or limit Trump’s assertions of dictatorial executive power in his second term.

Many of the justices were skeptical that Trump had the power to impose sweeping tariffs, since the Constitution squarely gives that power to Congress

Liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor was blunt: “I just don’t understand,” she said. “This is not a presidential power. It’s a congressional power.”