What would be most interesting to me, because I'm a nerd is a summary of what gets learned at SPARC that materially impacts ARC..
What would be most interesting to me, because I'm a nerd is a summary of what gets learned at SPARC that materially impacts ARC..
I don't understand the criticism of this approach. Is there a risk that SPARC doesn't hit a target, and there is some sort of unexpected nonlinear physics that pops up? Yes..always. That's why you do the demo sized device.
I don't understand the criticism of this approach. Is there a risk that SPARC doesn't hit a target, and there is some sort of unexpected nonlinear physics that pops up? Yes..always. That's why you do the demo sized device.
Maybe that should be my requirement from now on. If I'm going to take you seriously as an AI proponent, then you have to make and eat an AI generated meal.
Maybe that should be my requirement from now on. If I'm going to take you seriously as an AI proponent, then you have to make and eat an AI generated meal.
That's no different than asking a project who provides an installable container that runs on any linux distro whether they built their C library deps from source or yonked them from the base image their container was based on.
There's a lot of yonking going on. So much yonking.
That's no different than asking a project who provides an installable container that runs on any linux distro whether they built their C library deps from source or yonked them from the base image their container was based on.
There's a lot of yonking going on. So much yonking.
If Ubuntu drops 32 libs in its next LTS to avoid the epochalypse.... then you can expect CI/CD based testing of these builds to crater...and then you can expect upstream projects to deprecate.
If Ubuntu drops 32 libs in its next LTS to avoid the epochalypse.... then you can expect CI/CD based testing of these builds to crater...and then you can expect upstream projects to deprecate.