Then I will be incredibly disturbed on the day they put out the incredibly disturbing things.

Justice in this case can’t act on the idea of awful shit, it can only act on the evidence of it.

Tired of these Masters of Elusion.

Trickle-truth shit belongs in failing marriages, not politics.

Ok then fair’s fair:

Speaking of “COVERING”…

Why is Plaskett still allowed in the chambers?

You’ve never posted about Epstein.

Makes sense now. Can appreciate your focus in hiding hypocrisy.

Look, you’re a non-voting member. There’s no reason to stay and “fight”. You’ve probably been sweating this moment for years. Well…

It’s here now, and it’s bad.

Leave.

Losing position to take on the monitory side of a losing issue. This will become an inconvenient question during official attempts to climb the ladder.

The backslide from recent lessons is further disappointing.

Inspiration isn’t surviving aspirations here.

10/10 Goodest ghost

We ended both of them.

He’s trolling. It’s to disempower Crockett and AOCs’ rumored aspirations.

He’s always held contempt for “the squad” as riding a wave identity politics into office. AOC carved her own path for a time but reverted back to twitter insults and twitch meltdowns.

He just doesn’t respect them.

This is the state GOP eating Democrats’ midterm lunch, pun semi-unintended.

Did they advertise it as contingent on only for field operatives, though? So far in its practice it’s exactly how a signing bonus works. It’s up to the org to decide where to place their candidates.

Now if they’re getting $50k bonuses and NOT being hired, that’s very bad and unconventional.

I think you’re both already above all that.

Jesus god she gave them their very own “many people are saying”.

Tf is with CA Dems tanking softball interviews lately?

She couldn’t even get through the primaries on her recent stab at statewide office. Her name recognition got her a few digits above 2nd place in a race she started a year early.

Then she tanked a softball interview in freshly cynical times. And then she tanked an “apology” she had days to prep.

Unclear, would have appreciated the journalist clarifying why,m - when Ruiz understood that his sentence was reduced to 50 yrs - he had new “hope” with the result. May be due to parole/early release? Or he gets more privileges in prison? Precedent for a retrial?

Too much is missing in the article.

- he was 19, there *is* no “legal limit” of alcohol.
- here on work visa
- didn’t have a DL
- hit head-on at 75mph; victim was likely around 60mph. That’s a 135mph crash.
- he declined a deal for 30 years (in-line with similar penalty for woman in 2007)
- hollow “regret”

Why take *this* shit on?