I've been making plans for something like this for a while now... 🤓 We'll see if I ever actually build it! 😇

I don't think the argument "everyone else liked it" is going to work for me personally. 😝

From what I've read so far, I'm not seeing enough value in jj to make it worth learning a new thing when I already have something that works well for me.

Sounds a bit strange to my Git brain, but I guess it's just accomplishing a similar thing in a different way.

For example, if I've got several changes in my working copy, but I don't want to commit them all right away, I'll `git add -p` and commit the parts that are ready to go. IIUC, jj would commit the whole lot, and then I'd have split it up again later.

Hmm. Perhaps the root of it is: I'm fine with Git's several orthogonal concept. They work for me. Others don't really see it that way, so they are excited for something new.

Some of the things in the Git comparison (jj-vcs.github.io/jj/latest/gi...) sound negative to me. Why auto-commit the working copy…? Why get rid of the index? These Git features make sense to me, so changing them sounds bad.