jpowly.bsky.social
@jpowly.bsky.social
Lol blocked for having a different opinion based on evidence. What an absolute melt.
February 5, 2025 at 8:31 PM
You're a towel!
February 5, 2025 at 8:25 PM
I think you have to be insane to ignore the original evidence!!!
February 5, 2025 at 8:25 PM
What was announced today was the equivalent of the glove that did not fit for oj. A red herring, a distraction that is not fit to free a baby killer.
February 5, 2025 at 8:19 PM
And all the experts in the original case? www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/u...
Home - Courts and Tribunals Judiciary
Find out more See more courts and tribunals Popular links
www.judiciary.uk
February 5, 2025 at 8:15 PM
Which was already brought before in appeals and rejected. Read the appeal refusal document. This whole thing is nuts that people are overseeing so much evidence.
February 5, 2025 at 8:09 PM
It's one piece of evidence they have cast doubt on which other experts don't agree with. There is mountains of evidence against her: insulin found in babies bodies, she was alone with them all at the time, numerous concerns over her. Babies do not just die like this they get progressively more ill
February 5, 2025 at 7:41 PM
I'm flabbergasted at the amount of people falling for this nonsense. There is a huge amount of evidence against her that is being ignored. Reminds me of the groups of engineers that cast doubt on the twin towers.
February 5, 2025 at 7:38 PM