@jp811.bsky.social
Reposted
Boasberg now exploring the argument about being outside the US. He asks whether the DOJ is arguing that because the plane was outside US airspace, his order did not apply.
DOJ says no, "removal" had already happened because they had already left US airspace.
/ps under immigration law that's BS.
DOJ says no, "removal" had already happened because they had already left US airspace.
/ps under immigration law that's BS.
March 17, 2025 at 9:27 PM
Boasberg now exploring the argument about being outside the US. He asks whether the DOJ is arguing that because the plane was outside US airspace, his order did not apply.
DOJ says no, "removal" had already happened because they had already left US airspace.
/ps under immigration law that's BS.
DOJ says no, "removal" had already happened because they had already left US airspace.
/ps under immigration law that's BS.