Jo Romack
@joromac.bsky.social
🥸 Retired University Educator 🎓
⚙️ Small Business Owner 👔
🏹 Well-Armed Lefty 🔫
"When they go low, we kick 'em in the head"
⚙️ Small Business Owner 👔
🏹 Well-Armed Lefty 🔫
"When they go low, we kick 'em in the head"
Anyone who tries is FUCKED.
We ALL have the DUTY to overthrow that kind of tyranny.
We ALL have the DUTY to overthrow that kind of tyranny.
November 19, 2025 at 10:36 AM
Anyone who tries is FUCKED.
We ALL have the DUTY to overthrow that kind of tyranny.
We ALL have the DUTY to overthrow that kind of tyranny.
I am not treating anything as such,
I am simply explaining how US LAW HAS BEEN INTERPRETED BY US JUDGES for DECADES.
Can you even be bothered to read what SCOTUS ruled about it in 1976's U.S. v. Martinez-Fuerte?
How it expended during Bush's Patriot Act, and subsequent 2015 Freedom Act? 🤦♂️ffs...
I am simply explaining how US LAW HAS BEEN INTERPRETED BY US JUDGES for DECADES.
Can you even be bothered to read what SCOTUS ruled about it in 1976's U.S. v. Martinez-Fuerte?
How it expended during Bush's Patriot Act, and subsequent 2015 Freedom Act? 🤦♂️ffs...
November 18, 2025 at 11:38 PM
I am not treating anything as such,
I am simply explaining how US LAW HAS BEEN INTERPRETED BY US JUDGES for DECADES.
Can you even be bothered to read what SCOTUS ruled about it in 1976's U.S. v. Martinez-Fuerte?
How it expended during Bush's Patriot Act, and subsequent 2015 Freedom Act? 🤦♂️ffs...
I am simply explaining how US LAW HAS BEEN INTERPRETED BY US JUDGES for DECADES.
Can you even be bothered to read what SCOTUS ruled about it in 1976's U.S. v. Martinez-Fuerte?
How it expended during Bush's Patriot Act, and subsequent 2015 Freedom Act? 🤦♂️ffs...
Start at the top. Your own son is a MASSIVE enabler of the cartels...
November 18, 2025 at 11:06 PM
Start at the top. Your own son is a MASSIVE enabler of the cartels...
your reading comprehesion is abysmal.
Keep up or stfu.
Keep up or stfu.
November 18, 2025 at 11:05 PM
your reading comprehesion is abysmal.
Keep up or stfu.
Keep up or stfu.
She didn't "give him loyalty for free"...
She sold out her constituents, betrayed her oath, and helped destroy her country.
That's a pretty price!
She sold out her constituents, betrayed her oath, and helped destroy her country.
That's a pretty price!
November 18, 2025 at 11:04 PM
She didn't "give him loyalty for free"...
She sold out her constituents, betrayed her oath, and helped destroy her country.
That's a pretty price!
She sold out her constituents, betrayed her oath, and helped destroy her country.
That's a pretty price!
Check his hard-drives.
November 18, 2025 at 11:01 PM
Check his hard-drives.
please read ACTUAL US LAW instead third-party incorrect interpretations... 🤦♂️ ffs.
November 18, 2025 at 10:59 PM
please read ACTUAL US LAW instead third-party incorrect interpretations... 🤦♂️ ffs.
it does so at the secretary's discretion.
November 18, 2025 at 10:37 PM
it does so at the secretary's discretion.
19 U.S. Code § 1644a says you're wrong
November 18, 2025 at 10:24 PM
19 U.S. Code § 1644a says you're wrong
19 U.S. Code § 1644a says you're wrong
November 18, 2025 at 10:24 PM
19 U.S. Code § 1644a says you're wrong
19 U.S. Code § 1644a says you're wrong
November 18, 2025 at 10:23 PM
19 U.S. Code § 1644a says you're wrong
19 U.S. Code § 1644a says you're wrong
November 18, 2025 at 10:23 PM
19 U.S. Code § 1644a says you're wrong
19 U.S. Code § 1644a says you're wrong
November 18, 2025 at 10:23 PM
19 U.S. Code § 1644a says you're wrong
you are incorrect. Do better research.
November 18, 2025 at 10:21 PM
you are incorrect. Do better research.
Reposted by Jo Romack
She should have said, "What the hell did you just call me?"
No job is worth being treated like that.
No balls.
No job is worth being treated like that.
No balls.
November 18, 2025 at 5:03 PM
She should have said, "What the hell did you just call me?"
No job is worth being treated like that.
No balls.
No job is worth being treated like that.
No balls.
Reposted by Jo Romack
I disagree. Then people can weaponize felonies against political adversaries.
He should have been disqualified for attempting to overthrow the U.S. government.
He should have been disqualified for attempting to overthrow the U.S. government.
November 18, 2025 at 5:46 PM
I disagree. Then people can weaponize felonies against political adversaries.
He should have been disqualified for attempting to overthrow the U.S. government.
He should have been disqualified for attempting to overthrow the U.S. government.
that map is inaccurate, since airports and waterways also count. 95% of the US falls under that change.
November 18, 2025 at 5:10 AM
that map is inaccurate, since airports and waterways also count. 95% of the US falls under that change.
and waterways, which gives them access to 95% of the US to conduct warrantless searches, seizures, and arrests.
November 18, 2025 at 5:09 AM
and waterways, which gives them access to 95% of the US to conduct warrantless searches, seizures, and arrests.