Open-access link:
journals.humankinetics.com/view/journal...
9/10
Open-access link:
journals.humankinetics.com/view/journal...
9/10
8/10
8/10
7/10
7/10
This aligns with long-term studies showing minimal impact of endurance exercise intensity on gains in fat-free mass.
6/10
This aligns with long-term studies showing minimal impact of endurance exercise intensity on gains in fat-free mass.
6/10
• Single-leg maximal workload and VO2peak improved with both HIIT and MICT.
• Myofibrillar protein synthesis did not differ between HIIT, MICT, or the control period.
5/10
• Single-leg maximal workload and VO2peak improved with both HIIT and MICT.
• Myofibrillar protein synthesis did not differ between HIIT, MICT, or the control period.
5/10
4/10
4/10
Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates were assessed, reflecting the synthesis of muscle contractile proteins.
3/10
Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates were assessed, reflecting the synthesis of muscle contractile proteins.
3/10
Interval training is often promoted as a time-efficient alternative to steady continuous cardio, and some claim it might even stimulate more muscle growth.
2/10
Interval training is often promoted as a time-efficient alternative to steady continuous cardio, and some claim it might even stimulate more muscle growth.
2/10
HIIT vs MICT
✅ Within-participant design
✅ Unilateral cycling model
✅ MPS over 2 weeks
Let’s break it down (1/10)
HIIT vs MICT
✅ Within-participant design
✅ Unilateral cycling model
✅ MPS over 2 weeks
Let’s break it down (1/10)
9/x
9/x
8/x
8/x
This study shows that information alone can increase motivation, but that this does not always lead to behavior change. Even motivated individuals may fail to act.
7/x
This study shows that information alone can increase motivation, but that this does not always lead to behavior change. Even motivated individuals may fail to act.
7/x
- Education combined with a planning task increased both motivation and actual exercise participation (91% of participants exercised at least once in the week following the intervention).
6/x
- Education combined with a planning task increased both motivation and actual exercise participation (91% of participants exercised at least once in the week following the intervention).
6/x
- Education alone increased the motivation to exercise but did not increase actual exercise participation; many participants reported being ‘too busy to exercise’.
5/x
- Education alone increased the motivation to exercise but did not increase actual exercise participation; many participants reported being ‘too busy to exercise’.
5/x
1. Control: reading a neutral text (first three paragraphs of a novel)
2. Motivation: reading a leaflet with information about the health benefits of exercise
3. Planning: received the same leaflet plus completed a planning task specifying what, when, and where to exercise
4/x
1. Control: reading a neutral text (first three paragraphs of a novel)
2. Motivation: reading a leaflet with information about the health benefits of exercise
3. Planning: received the same leaflet plus completed a planning task specifying what, when, and where to exercise
4/x
3/x
3/x
2/x
2/x
Exercise participation and:
- Impact of education?
- Impact of concrete planning?
Let’s break it down!
1/x
Exercise participation and:
- Impact of education?
- Impact of concrete planning?
Let’s break it down!
1/x
10/x
10/x
9/x
9/x
This large-scale trial indicates that replacing sugar with sweeteners helps maintain weight loss.
Moreover, the use of sweeteners did not adversely affect cardiometabolic health and improved the gut microbiome.
8/x
This large-scale trial indicates that replacing sugar with sweeteners helps maintain weight loss.
Moreover, the use of sweeteners did not adversely affect cardiometabolic health and improved the gut microbiome.
8/x
• The sweeteners group maintained greater weight loss (1.6±0.7 kg).
• The sweeteners group showed beneficial changes in the gut microbiome.
• No significant differences between the groups were observed for cardiometabolic health markers
• The sweeteners group maintained greater weight loss (1.6±0.7 kg).
• The sweeteners group showed beneficial changes in the gut microbiome.
• No significant differences between the groups were observed for cardiometabolic health markers
• The sugar group was allowed <10% of total energy from sugar.
• The sweetener group replaced sugar with sweeteners as much as possible
6/x
• The sugar group was allowed <10% of total energy from sugar.
• The sweetener group replaced sugar with sweeteners as much as possible
6/x
Participants (341 adults and 38 children) with overweight or obesity first followed a two-month weight-loss diet (>5% reduction in body weight).
5/x
Participants (341 adults and 38 children) with overweight or obesity first followed a two-month weight-loss diet (>5% reduction in body weight).
5/x
The evidence is conflicting, likely due to differences in study design.
4/x
The evidence is conflicting, likely due to differences in study design.
4/x