@jorgemmteixeira.bsky.social
Likely a stupid question, but in RCTs, usually the control group data is excluded from mediation analysis?
September 5, 2025 at 2:10 PM
Likely a stupid question, but in RCTs, usually the control group data is excluded from mediation analysis?
1) Yeah. 😅 Meanwhile after re-reading got my own answer. 😅
2) I meant differently. Let's use sbp case that had 7 mmhg of tau. That means 95% of mean responses ranged by 28 mmhg? How do you translate that value in pratical terms?
2) I meant differently. Let's use sbp case that had 7 mmhg of tau. That means 95% of mean responses ranged by 28 mmhg? How do you translate that value in pratical terms?
September 1, 2025 at 12:49 PM
1) Yeah. 😅 Meanwhile after re-reading got my own answer. 😅
2) I meant differently. Let's use sbp case that had 7 mmhg of tau. That means 95% of mean responses ranged by 28 mmhg? How do you translate that value in pratical terms?
2) I meant differently. Let's use sbp case that had 7 mmhg of tau. That means 95% of mean responses ranged by 28 mmhg? How do you translate that value in pratical terms?
1) So, Person-by-treatment interaction does tend to yield a simillar value of tau in a meta-analysis? 2) What is the clinical interpretation of it? Ty!
August 30, 2025 at 11:27 AM
1) So, Person-by-treatment interaction does tend to yield a simillar value of tau in a meta-analysis? 2) What is the clinical interpretation of it? Ty!
Ignoring that :)
July 26, 2025 at 10:54 AM
Ignoring that :)
What answers Q5 is a prediction interval?
July 24, 2025 at 8:57 AM
What answers Q5 is a prediction interval?
Reposted
Link:
CDC datasets uploaded before January 28th, 2025 : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
An archive of all CDC datasets uploaded to https://data.cdc.gov/browse before January 28th, 2025. Excludes corrupt datasets and data not publicly accessible.
archive.org
February 3, 2025 at 4:38 AM
Link:
I think twisk's book mentions that model. One more, if possible...which assumptions should be checked for that model? ty
January 25, 2025 at 12:34 PM
I think twisk's book mentions that model. One more, if possible...which assumptions should be checked for that model? ty
Are there any issues with adding a random slope to
l2 <- lmer(
data = dl,
y ~ 1 + time + tx:time + (1 | id)) ? I believe it would yield the same results for both ancovas
l2 <- lmer(
data = dl,
y ~ 1 + time + tx:time + (1 | id)) ? I believe it would yield the same results for both ancovas
January 23, 2025 at 4:27 PM
Are there any issues with adding a random slope to
l2 <- lmer(
data = dl,
y ~ 1 + time + tx:time + (1 | id)) ? I believe it would yield the same results for both ancovas
l2 <- lmer(
data = dl,
y ~ 1 + time + tx:time + (1 | id)) ? I believe it would yield the same results for both ancovas