@jordoser.bsky.social
That’s just dishonest. Your comment was that your assumption if someone had time to read is they were “underemployed”.
Not that society didn’t give them time to read.
Not that they were likely care givers.
You’re assumption was that they didn’t have enough job.
Now you’re just backtracking
Not that society didn’t give them time to read.
Not that they were likely care givers.
You’re assumption was that they didn’t have enough job.
Now you’re just backtracking
November 19, 2024 at 4:40 PM
That’s just dishonest. Your comment was that your assumption if someone had time to read is they were “underemployed”.
Not that society didn’t give them time to read.
Not that they were likely care givers.
You’re assumption was that they didn’t have enough job.
Now you’re just backtracking
Not that society didn’t give them time to read.
Not that they were likely care givers.
You’re assumption was that they didn’t have enough job.
Now you’re just backtracking
The most American take I’ve ever seen. “People who read books should be working more”. A perfect intersection of anti intellectualism and late stage capitalism.
November 19, 2024 at 4:00 PM
The most American take I’ve ever seen. “People who read books should be working more”. A perfect intersection of anti intellectualism and late stage capitalism.