I recommend the article to anyone interested in how people with autism and/or learning disability are affected by the Mental Health Act 1983 and Mental Health Bill 2024! 👀📖
@lisaperry.bsky.social @doughtystreet.bsky.social insights.doughtystreet.co.uk/post/102k68x...
I recommend the article to anyone interested in how people with autism and/or learning disability are affected by the Mental Health Act 1983 and Mental Health Bill 2024! 👀📖
insights.doughtystreet.co.uk/post/102k4wx...
insights.doughtystreet.co.uk/post/102k4wx...
P with anorexia was at end-of-life. CoP:
1) Declared that P lacked treatment capacity and;
2) Made s16 decision for intubated refeeding under sedation in an ICU.
P with anorexia was at end-of-life. CoP:
1) Declared that P lacked treatment capacity and;
2) Made s16 decision for intubated refeeding under sedation in an ICU.
Hayden J criticised neuro hospital for keeping P in PDOC for nine years when P wouldn't have wanted that.
Held hosp should keep such Ps' best interests under rolling review, with prompt CoP application if appropriate.
Hayden J criticised neuro hospital for keeping P in PDOC for nine years when P wouldn't have wanted that.
Held hosp should keep such Ps' best interests under rolling review, with prompt CoP application if appropriate.
Q: Did CoP have jurisdiction over the P&A (awarded in UK) of a <16yo P now habitually resident in India?
A: 'Yes' as: (i) A14 of Hague Convention preserved that jurisdiction unless India modified, replaced or terminated it and; (ii) India hadn't.
Q: Did CoP have jurisdiction over the P&A (awarded in UK) of a <16yo P now habitually resident in India?
A: 'Yes' as: (i) A14 of Hague Convention preserved that jurisdiction unless India modified, replaced or terminated it and; (ii) India hadn't.
OS appealed three s15 declarations made by T2 judge. Theis J allowed appeal and:
1) Held that, per s3(1), one need not have insight into one's impairment/disturbance to have capacity.
2) Provided a ten-stage 'checklist' to capacity assessors [60].
OS appealed three s15 declarations made by T2 judge. Theis J allowed appeal and:
1) Held that, per s3(1), one need not have insight into one's impairment/disturbance to have capacity.
2) Provided a ten-stage 'checklist' to capacity assessors [60].
CoP discharged P&A deputy (P's mother) because they breached their duties and caused P financial loss.
Panel deputy appointed instead. Whilst "court will always prefer to have a family member as deputy" [16], none were available here.
CoP discharged P&A deputy (P's mother) because they breached their duties and caused P financial loss.
Panel deputy appointed instead. Whilst "court will always prefer to have a family member as deputy" [16], none were available here.
1) Fact-finding: www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWC...
Found 4x contempts: contrary to injcts, Grundy attended P’s home unsupervised 4x times.
2) Sentencing: www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWC...
Sentenced to immediate custody; 2x 28-day terms, running concurrently.
1) Fact-finding: www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWC...
Found 4x contempts: contrary to injcts, Grundy attended P’s home unsupervised 4x times.
2) Sentencing: www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWC...
Sentenced to immediate custody; 2x 28-day terms, running concurrently.
CoP approved discontinuation of CANH to JP, who was in PODC/PVS following brain injury.
Hayden J so held in light of (inter alia) family evidence, JP's likely wishes & feelings, and care plan which foretold a 'peaceful and dignified' end of life.
CoP approved discontinuation of CANH to JP, who was in PODC/PVS following brain injury.
Hayden J so held in light of (inter alia) family evidence, JP's likely wishes & feelings, and care plan which foretold a 'peaceful and dignified' end of life.
LM appealing against committal for contempt, having put videos of P (daughter) online against CoP injunctions.
CoA made interim declaration that LM lacked litigation capacity, referred to CoP (T3) to determine capacity & adjourned appeal.
LM appealing against committal for contempt, having put videos of P (daughter) online against CoP injunctions.
CoA made interim declaration that LM lacked litigation capacity, referred to CoP (T3) to determine capacity & adjourned appeal.
18 y/o P subject to community DoL. CoP:
1) Stressed that, when authorising a DoL, it is not mandating restrictions amounting to a DoL (but permitting them if in BI).
2) Made costs order for wholesale breaches of directions order.
18 y/o P subject to community DoL. CoP:
1) Stressed that, when authorising a DoL, it is not mandating restrictions amounting to a DoL (but permitting them if in BI).
2) Made costs order for wholesale breaches of directions order.