Jonny Marshall
jonnymarshall.bsky.social
Jonny Marshall
@jonnymarshall.bsky.social
Principal Economist at the Resolution Foundation @resfoundation.bsky.social working on energy and climate policy
By spreading the costs of these policies over the general tax base, nearly three-in-four British households would be better off. We would also spur on the net zero transition by making electricity cheaper, and avoid landing HMT with an unmanageable bill 7/
October 16, 2025 at 9:33 AM
Taxpayers and billpayers are of course the same people. But the distributional consequences of raising money through bills or taxes is very different 6/
October 16, 2025 at 9:33 AM
We think that the costs of welfare policies and (some) energy policies should be moved from bill payers to taxpayers – and carbon taxes that have served their purpose should be cut. 5/
October 16, 2025 at 9:33 AM
And Government should be looking to act as energy bills are where the cost-of-living crisis continues to hit family budgets.

Bills are 25% higher in real terms than they were before the energy crisis and they represent one of the biggest costs families face 4/
October 16, 2025 at 9:33 AM
We should look to change these stealth taxes. But any changes here need to work for vulnerable households, for the net zero transition, and be realistic within the Government’s fiscal rules 3/
October 16, 2025 at 9:33 AM
Energy bills are too high, and one of the main drivers of this is the ~£7 billion cost of policies that land on them. This is, in effect, a secret tax-and-benefit system – but one funded badly 2/
October 16, 2025 at 9:33 AM
Other ways of cutting bills (such as nil-rating VAT) are seemingly being discussed in Government too, but we’ll have a @resfoundation.bsky.social note out next month on how to cut bills in a way that works both distributionally and environmentally
September 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM
And those that do save would see smaller average savings than those who lose out - £67 per year compared with £90 per year.
September 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM
Any potential benefits wouldn’t be focussed on lower income families – just 18 per cent of the poorest fifth of households could save £100 or more from a low standing charge tariff, a similar proportion to the richest fifth
September 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM
The regulator can’t wish costs away: lower standing charges mean higher unit costs – penalising those with high energy demand and actively working against the net zero transition by making electric cars and heat pumps more expensive to run
September 24, 2025 at 12:58 PM
Unit prices relatively unchanged, but still way higher than pre-crisis levels. Higher unit prices are a big deal as we head into winter when families use most of their energy
August 27, 2025 at 8:43 AM
Instead they can be effective at helping those on higher incomes bridge credit constraints that are currently holding back efforts to decarbonise homes
August 7, 2025 at 11:00 AM