If it’s like Among Us, Werewolf, etc, I’m guessing almost everyone is little better than chance in their guesses - because lying and lie-detecting were stuck in an evolutionary arms race for millions of years - but comes up with a lot of reasonable sounding explanations for their decisions?

Long stolen antiques roadshow: set in the British Museum?

9️⃣ Even nice guys "trade up" - Despite his idealism, TBL's personal life follows familiar patterns of successful men through serial monogamy

8️⃣ Apps as walled gardens - Mobile apps became profit-driven gatekeepers,

7️⃣ Data ownership revolution - His current passion: SOLID pods that would give individuals ownership and control over their personal data

6️⃣ Household microcultures matter - TBL's eccentric brilliance flourished in a family that encouraged unconventional pursuits without judgment

5️⃣ The semantic web's legacy - While TBL's vision for machine-readable data didn't materialize as hoped, it may have prevented today's eloquent but unreliable LLMs

4️⃣ Information, not engagement - TBL designed the web for information discovery (like Wikipedia), not the addictive engagement models dominating today's commercial web

3️⃣ Dancing between structures - The US capitalized on Europe's invention because it balanced top-down internet infrastructure with bottom-up university experimentation

2️⃣ The myth of efficiency - CERN's "inefficient" tolerance of TBL's experimentation gave birth to the web, suggesting rigid organizational efficiency can kill innovation

1️⃣ Purpose over profit - TBL chose to keep the web open and free rather than monetize it, prioritizing universal access over personal wealth

This seems borderline religious thinking, essentially posing Antifa as a kind of Satanic presence

Hasn’t it been a centuries-long convention that writers for the Economist tend to be anonymous or pseudonymous? (Which in a way seems oddly collectivist/socialist given the magazine’s title!)