Sent you a DM :)

I'm just saying this is a power-adjacent concern that is relevant even in a large sample :) d=.24 is not tiny for sure. and .24 and .28 sound pretty similar to me, regardless of the p-value :)

Being underpowered might not be an issue, but if one relies on p-values with an alpha level of .05 (which I would never recommend but especially not here), then the opposite becomes relevant - are effects significant that are trivially small? That is something worth exploring and thinking about

@kevinmking.bsky.social and I need all the help we can get if we hope to do a half-decent study

Thank you, Colette! We’ll start data collection for the follow-up experiment in January :)

Imagine saying everyday on tv you are all about eliminating waste fraud and abuse and then being ok with this, the hypocrisy of Republicans is unfathomable

Thats fair! :)

(I’m also not advocating for anything to be a default across an entire field, I have talked about what I see sensible for my work and that of people who are in a similar position to me)

So you’re saying you don’t know clinical psych well but know better than us who have worked in and reviewed in this field for years? I’m not assuming that it’s a sensible default for marine biology because I know exactly nothing about marine biology

Then anyone with a brain will agree it’s ok to hold off on sharing the data until they are done :) this does not apply to 99% of clinical psych but plenty of people will use this as justification to hold onto their mturk data

I, as many other people, get paid a salary (funded by taxpayer money) to collect data and write code. Why should they be my property “until the effort put in is paid off”? I alrdy got paid to do this work! Now they belong to those who paid for them, which is everyone

I agree mostly and I think there are many ways to go about this but I also think the point of the OP applies to this as well, most people don’t appear to try to do that either ;)