Yes he did, and to quote Erykah Badu: “I am an artist and I’m sensitive about my sh*t," I wrote the neutrality policy amendment that is now in the bylaws 🙂

Between Hogg and reporters who weren't on the call, they're looking to make this bigger than what it is. This is not that, Fin! (6/6)

*Typed on my phone with emotion. Forgive me for the grammar.

John Verdejo
Executive Committee/Resolution Committee
DNC

That said, what you are reading did not go down like that. I tell you this, and those who know me know I will keep it straight. This time, the DNC is not on some conspiracy sh*t. Now, those other times, that's another thread (5/6).

As such, a ruling was made to correct things after much discussion and expert testimonies (attorneys and such). Irony would have it that the verdict came down right around the same time Hogg and the DNC are at an impasse about his dealings. Again, nothing to do with Hogg (4/6).

The ruling from the credentials committee to re-run the vice chair race has nothing to do with Hogg, and, unfortunately, he is taking it there. They don't tell you that complaints about election mistakes were filed a few days immediately after the DNC elections (3/6).

The DNC is 𝗡𝗢𝗧 going after David Hogg—full stop! Although I have thoughts about Hogg and how he may be using the DNC vice-chair position that seems "questionable," the ruling to re-run the election is separate and apart (2/6).