The “peeparazzi” I think.

Incompetence driven by unthinking doctrine and malicious dismissal of popular safety or greater good, is indistinguishable from corrupt malice.

“Of course not! That’s ridiculous! Proud Boys form the backbone of the new ICE, so how could they be domestic terrorists?”

The EO does not have the force of law, so states should be able to constructively ignore it for issues associated with safety and security. It becomes murky and corrupt when #Trumpovich decides to use funding to states or programs as a bludgeon against anyone who doesn’t follow his guidelines.

#Trumpovich would just have him erased again, just like the preceding time.

Don’t forget the new idea that visitors will have to provide access to their social media for the previous several years. That’s certainly not an acceptability criterion in my mind.

There goes what remains of the tourism industry.

I find it SO difficult to understand how people can listen to this idiot and think highly of him. What an utter waste of air that the rest of us could be breathing.

She could call Hunter Biden or any of the Capitol Police after the January 6th insurrection for tips on handling right-wing nutcase death threats.

You’re missing an important point about #Trumpovich . He doesn’t care about his promises. When his support slides, he bad-mouths his boogeyman opponents to the press, his idiot supporters get behind him (because it’s all the XYZ’s fault), and any thought of positive action disappears.

In view of the immunity decision, how so?

“Let’s talk about how you made the culture poisonous BEFORE I address how I have pointed out your poison in my journalism.”

The problem is his corruption and illegal behavior is all considered immune by the corrupt SC. How does one get past that?

Add the rapid expansion of USG debt levels as a contributing factor this time, too.

Of course, that would require people in leadership positions to take their jobs seriously. And how many of his sycophants will do that?

The moral and ethical implications of agreeing with those who sympathize or contribute to the evil being done mean that the one agreeing compromises his/her own ethics.