Hundreds. Holy cow.

just saying: it's possible that "I'm gonna dramatically constrict my state capacity while plotting dramatic imperial expansion, and expanding my set of internal enemies while alienating most of my foreign allies" is the beginning of a world-historical masterstroke. but also possible that it isn't

Thank you for this, USBANCORP 🤖

This drug essentially facilitates a lifestyle change so I hope they can work out their differences here. www.nytimes.com/2024/12/18/h...

Starter packs are cool.

I don’t follow PSA or Favreau too closely, but he’s right on target here. When we dismiss the viewpoints of most people who voted for the other side, aren’t we suggesting the election results are invalid (not reflecting the *real* wishes of the people)? www.theatlantic.com/politics/arc...

Krugman’s final column for @nytimes.com

As I see it, we’ve had a collapse of trust in elites: The public no longer has faith that the people running things know what they’re doing, or that we can assume that they’re being honest.

www.nytimes.com/2024/12/09/o...

Some very good advice here although I prefer using limitations to express the limits of (how far you can take) the conclusions of your paper. Sometimes limitations sections turn into self-flagellation.

How to write a scientific paper in four slides.

Full guide here: www.surgeryredesign.com/s/WritingFor...

YouTube format here: youtu.be/fgeahUrXVaY?...

#meded #medsky #research