Also everyone is acting like his Reddit posts were made by a 16 year old and not someone pushing 30. I can forgive a 16 year old saying edgy stuff online but I have much less sympathy for the judgment of a full ass adult.

Dem leadership are so bad at being adaptable in the media environment. They see affordability rightfully being a winning issue but then seem to have a complete inability to focus on literally any other issue even when it’s a clear political winner. Its maddening.

So what are dems supposed to do just sit there and look angry?? Also if the wealthy control the media that strongly as you suggest it doesn’t matter what you do. You have to do something different to make a splash and not showing up and talking to victims of the trump admin does just that.

I keep seeing this talking point and who cares if Johnson does that?? If the dems boycott that becomes the talking point rather than trumps speech. You actually have a chance to control the narrative for once instead of just responding to Trumps provocations.

Doesn’t this just prove voters don’t really have any actual theory of politics? There’s no ideological motivation behind voters actions, in fact their beliefs are just wrong in this case. How are you supposed to follow the voters if they seemingly have no grasp on actual electoral reality?

Watermelon slices on social media bios are not evidence of anything. I am talking about actual election data, that shows Harris lost the election because of voters specifically not voting because of Gaza.

Do you have any actual evidence that voters stayed home because of Gaza? Seriously do you have any actual definitive evidence that Gaza cost her the election? Or are you just too busy acting morally superior? And before you dogpile on me I waited in a line for 3 hours to vote for Harris.