Antisemitism also stands on ideological fantasies and constructed theories of dogmatic thinking. blogs.timesofisrael.com/sorry-mr-cho...

I had not heard that? What does he say about eugenics - can you link please?

I am sure Hamas has a plan for those released from prison...

Is it just a coincidence then that they have not produced photos of starving children who do not have preexisting illnesses? Or adults?

Yes, true of course. I just felt the summation made it sound as if this was all new stuff. But, I should not make snap judgements and read up on what they actually claim, instead:)

Do you hage insider information as to this abuse she was supposedly an apologist over? It would seem there were no charges brought and it is word against word, no?

They might be referencing prior work in epistemology in their work, but what is seen in this summation is not particularly innovative nor substantive. It saddens me when so much good work exists on a topic that it is not used as a starting point rather than inventing the wheel all over.

Really? All of conservatism and all of conservatists? You do not think your post is a tad of what you are accusing them of?

Strange that no walk outs were had when Iran spoke. Or Syria. Or Nigeria. Or you know, any country that kills its own and hosts terrorists and shit.

I usually watch people I agree with as well as people I disagree with. The broader the spectrum of guests the better. How else will I stay informed? Hence, I still watch Maher. Sometimes I agree with him/his guests. Sometimes not. Funny that.

As far as I can see he never laughed at the murder of others but condemned violence. Why can't you just say you hate most of his views and not make shit up? It is so unnecessary and it contributes to this awful culture of hate. Regardless of our beliefs attack the beliefs, not the person.

You are dishonest. When did Kirk say these things? He was a very conservative man but seriously, there is no need to make shit up.

What is Islamic by that reasoning then?

I have yet to meet anyone who has actually read what they claim to have pretentiously read. And what a strange compilation - Cellini, Lermontov, Nietzsche? Not a woman amongst them nor anything purely pleasurable, analytical or from further a field.... Not really the list of someone "well-read".

Jag har hört det men vad var förtal? Varför denna otrevliga ton?

Polisanmäl för vad? Slarv? Korkade medarbetare?

Who is to be the arbitrer of what is fair to dismiss swiftly and what deserves the full legal process? The problem is evidnet when the same minute is used against one's own "side" in the same manner, no? Hence the courts cannot ever be allowed to deviate from procedure.