Jeremy Ogilvie-Harris
@jogilvieharris.bsky.social
Barrister, Cornerstone Barristers. Formerly of Hackney Law Centre, Southwark Law Centre and Queen Mary Uni. Public Law LLM from UCL. Interests: Public Law, Human Rights, Housing, Benefits, Planning, Data Protection and Information, National Security
One says “Army” and the other looks like “Marine Corps”
April 19, 2025 at 4:15 PM
One says “Army” and the other looks like “Marine Corps”
The picture with Starmer looks like what one might expect to be the office of a military dictator.
April 19, 2025 at 2:15 PM
The picture with Starmer looks like what one might expect to be the office of a military dictator.
We were granted permission today, but stayed pending First-tier Tribunal proceedings.
April 15, 2025 at 4:34 PM
We were granted permission today, but stayed pending First-tier Tribunal proceedings.
(Regardless of one's position on the election of judges)
April 2, 2025 at 7:52 AM
(Regardless of one's position on the election of judges)
It's refreshing to see that money doesn't always win in the democratic process!
April 2, 2025 at 7:51 AM
It's refreshing to see that money doesn't always win in the democratic process!
I understand your point. But what happens where a polycentric decision is made which doesn’t factor in art 8. In those circs, court is to apply judicial restraint: eg see Carlile v SSHD. Shouldn’t the court simply quash the decision and remit it for reconsideration?
February 25, 2025 at 9:22 PM
I understand your point. But what happens where a polycentric decision is made which doesn’t factor in art 8. In those circs, court is to apply judicial restraint: eg see Carlile v SSHD. Shouldn’t the court simply quash the decision and remit it for reconsideration?
Yes. That was part of the reasoning in Ghaoui. On the other hand, it is also clear that Strasbourg requires that the *decision making process* complies with art. 8 ECHR by providing sufficient protection to the right, which is a procedural protection.
February 25, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Yes. That was part of the reasoning in Ghaoui. On the other hand, it is also clear that Strasbourg requires that the *decision making process* complies with art. 8 ECHR by providing sufficient protection to the right, which is a procedural protection.